Unless the shroud gets up and walks on water, no matter what the date, it still doesn't prove that the image is Jesus. To carry it a little further, doesn't anyone think it's funny that it's a common "conceptual image" of Jesus?
Not really. Since the shroud was an object of veneration, if the public believed that it truly represented the image of Christ, then the shroud would affect how artists of that time would portray Jesus. So the question becomes which came first: the veneration and popular acceptance of the shroud as the image of Christ or the image of Christ in the artwork of the time?
Doesn't look Jewish to me. Thought it was Di Vinci's handiwork...
I'm that rarest of birds, one who doesn't have an opinion on the shroud either way. It won't change my faith one iota if it's fake, or if it's true.
You pose a good question, but I'd have to ask - where did the conceptual images *come* from? :D
Yep, way too perfect traditional Euro-centric 'Jesus' image. For all we know he looked like an Mid-Eastern Don Rickles.
"a common conceptual image"
By that I assume you mean that it looks like the velvet pictures. :-D
Actually, the explanation of that is simple. He was extremely important to the people who knew him. They would have passed on information about how he looked. If the shroud had been around and seen by members of the early church, it would have served as a template. Finally, there is the Holy Spirit.
Fake or real, the pictures on the Shroud of Turin are pictures of Jesus. If the Shroud is fake, then the artist intended us to believe that the pictures are pictures of Jesus. If the Shroud is real, and the pictures are the product of a natural phenomenon or a miracle, then they are almost certainly pictures of Jesus.
There are no descriptions of Jesus' appearance in the New Testament. Nor are there any reputable descriptions in any known early Church sources. St. Augustine of Hippo made a point of this when he wrote his monumental works in the fifth century. Yet, starting in the sixth century a new picture, a new common appearance for Jesus emerged in eastern art. We see it today in all manner of pictures of Jesus: icons, paintings, mosaics and Byzantine coins. This common picture quality seems to have started in the Middle East about the same time that the Image of Edessa was discovered. Prior to this time, pictures of Jesus were mostly of a young, beardless man, often with short hair, often in story-like settings in which he was depicted as a shepherd.
Catholic Ping - please freepmail me if you want on/off this list