Maine: Tax critic knocks Baldacci proposal

BANGOR - The debate over Gov. John Baldacci's tax reform proposal spread all over the map Wednesday. A day after the plan received its first public airing in Augusta, one of its chief detractors from Garland came to Bangor armed with a Colorado tax scholar, who panned the governor's plan as "weak and ineffective."

Instead, Barry Poulson, an economics professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, suggested Maine lawmakers institute a Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) similar to that in his home state, where the constitution strictly limits government spending.

During his talk at Wednesday's Bangor Region Chamber of Commerce breakfast, Poulson said Baldacci's plan allowed for easy circumvention of its proposed state spending limits. Baldacci's limits would be written into state statute, which requires a majority vote in the Legislature to change, rather than the state constitution, which requires a two-thirds vote in the Legislature and must be ratified by a majority of voters in a statewide election.

"You're giving the state an excuse to spend more money," Poulson said, who characterized state and local spending as "out of control."

Baldacci administration officials were quick to fire back at their Colorado critic, who, with Garland activist Mary Adams, helped craft a citizen initiative based on TABOR that could find its way to the ballot in Maine as soon as November of next year.

"It is beyond counterproductive," Baldacci spokesman Lee Umphrey said about the Wednesday forum, which did not include a representative from the governor's office. "We don't need any more misinformed tax experts. We have enough in Maine already."

At the Wednesday breakfast, Adams used a pony bridle to demonstrate the need for the more stringent spending controls in her plan.

"We need to put a bit in the mouth of government and give the reins to the people of Maine," said Adams, whose group is attempting to collect enough signatures to place her TABOR initiative on the ballot.

Adams used the same prop on Tuesday during the public hearing on Baldacci's tax plan before the Legislature's Joint Select Committee, which is continuing work on the proposal.

The committee plans to wrap up its work by Jan. 14 and have lawmakers take a final vote by Jan. 20, the deadline for petitioners such as Adams to submit the signatures required to force a 2005 referendum.

If lawmakers act after Jan. 20, and Adams is successful in gathering enough signatures, the legislative bill would be presented to voters as a competing measure on the November ballot.

The Maine State Chamber of Commerce also has a tax reform initiative in the works. Chamber officials have generally been optimistic about Baldacci's plan, although they have proposed stricter spending limits - but not as strict as Adams' bill, which ties spending to population growth and inflation.

Unlike the case in Colorado, Adams' initiative could not alter the Maine Constitution, which cannot be amended by a citizen initiative. But Adams said Wednesday she hoped state lawmakers would offer the constitutional amendment to signify they are serious about spending limits.

Poulson credited Colorado's TABOR initiative with helping to boost that state's economy, which indeed thrived during the late 1990s. But TABOR is not without its critics, who note the tax plan did not stop Colorado from suffering one of the nation's worst recessions during the first three years of the decade.

State Sen. Joe Perry, D-Bangor, a member of the select committee, said he was wary of the Colorado plan, which he deemed "largely ineffective." Instead, Perry predicted the Legislature - with Baldacci's initiative as a starting point - would arrive at some sort of consensus before the Jan. 20 deadline.

"It's the only plan I see that is serious about reducing the overall tax burden over time," Perry said

Foes eclipse fans of Baldacci's tax relief bill

AUGUSTA - Gov. John E. Baldacci's tax relief legislation absorbed a number of direct hits Tuesday during a daylong public hearing on the proposal that stretched into the evening. Critics ranged from teachers to lobster fishermen and far outnumbered proponents appearing before the Legislature's 15-member Joint Select Committee on Property Tax Reform that is reviewing the tax relief package that has been presented as two bills, LD 1 and LD 2. The largely supportive sentiments offered by the bills' sponsors, House Speaker John Richardson, D-Brunswick, and Senate President Beth Edmonds, D-Freeport, were quickly eclipsed by an outright rejection of the Baldacci plan by Geoff Herman, director of state and federal relations for the Maine Municipal Association.

"There is no tax reform from my perspective in this legislation," Herman told the panel.

Baldacci's multipronged legislation was written in response to the statewide June 8 Question 1A referendum vote that favored an MMA citizen initiative calling for the state to fund 55 percent of local education costs instead of the current 43 percent. The tax plan also features tools to decrease the state's overall tax burden as a percentage of personal income from 12.6 percent to about 10.65 percent within 10 years.

Key points include:

. A four-year phase-in of additional state revenues to bring the state's share of educational funding to 50 percent by the end of the next two-year budget cycle, which concludes June 30, 2007, and to 55 percent by the close of the budget cycle that ends June 30, 2009.

. Policies ensuring that no Maine residents will pay more than 6 percent of their income in property taxes through new state circuit-breaker and reverse mortgage loan programs.

. Statutory caps for state, local, county and school budgets based on average personal income growth.

. A constitutional amendment giving municipalities the option of valuing homestead land at current use levels to curb the escalation of taxes for high value property.

Herman told the committee members that the governor's bill changed the citizen initiative voters approved by removing the language that gave the initiative precedence over any other law.

"Question 1A was an entitlement, and the entitlement language is very important," Herman said. "Instead of being entitled to the 55 percent state funding as defined under 1A, [the law] becomes an entitlement to whatever the Legislature feels the voters should be entitled to."

He added that, if LD 1 were to pass as written, it would eliminate the ability to legally enforce the citizen initiative approved by the voters. Herman also challenged the administration's prediction that the legislation would decrease local property taxes by 8.6 percent and slammed Baldacci's spending caps for offering exemptions to the state that were not extended to county and municipal governments.

Observing that the governor's bill provided exceptions for the state to exceed spending caps in six circumstances, including unfunded or underfunded federal mandates and loss of revenue, Herman said it was "remarkable" that the bill seemed to allow a loophole for anything the Legislature might determine to be an "exceptional circumstance."

"Our policy is what's good for the goose is good for the gander," Herman said.

Herman's remarks clearly raised the hackles of panelists like Sen. Joe Perry, D-Bangor, who questioned the campaign that helped Question 1A win approval last June.

Perry said the MMA recently chose to describe the 1 percent tax cap plan on the November ballot as "flawed," but failed to acknowledge in June that its suggested method of financing Question 1A was to extend the sales tax to a number of currently exempt services, including residential electricity, residential gas and auto repairs.

"I would question whether voters would have passed 1A had they known [about the taxes] at the time," Perry said. "At least Palesky was clear."

Kathy Littlefield, first selectman for the town of Waldo, said the list of spending cap exemptions the state provided for itself was another example of the continuing message Augusta has sent to municipalities over the past few years.

"The state rules and, as I see it, the rest of us drools," she said. " ... [With this legislation] you have been handed the same old deck of cards that's just been shuffled a little differently with maybe a couple of extra jokers thrown in. What you need to do is throw that old deck away and ask for a new one."

Still, the value of taking a measured approach to tax relief was not lost on some members of the audience. Robert Ziegelaar, president of Telford Aviation in Bangor, said Maine must be competitive in order to attract new out-of-state and international business ties as well as provide incentives for businesses to remain here.

"We don't have to be the lowest-taxed state in the nation, but we also can't afford to stand out in terms of cost," he said. "The place to start is with Governor Baldacci's proposal. Another tax referendum with misplaced aspirations, disruptive debates and, most of all, economic uncertainty is not what Maine needs now. We believe the governor's package represents a reasonable approach to dealing with the macro-economic tax problems that confront our state."

Rosaire Pelletier of Madawaska said spending caps and educational funding reform are the primary tools needed to reduce the state's tax burden.

"The governor's bill does this by striking the right balance," he said.

The committee is scheduled to continue working on both bills today and has adopted a self-imposed deadline to complete its work by Jan. 14.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.