Posted on 10/30/2004 7:53:02 AM PDT by blam
A lemur is a primate. A tarsier is a primate. An aye-aye is a primate. A colugo is a primate. None of the aforementioned are hominds, apes, or even monkeys. You are the first person to bring up the origin of primates. Have a ball with it.
And there's also the matter of the genetic debris from a baboon virus which is found in African primate DNA, but not in human DNA, meaning that living humans' ancestors were not in Africa where they could contract it.
Or it could just mean that a baboon ancestor caught a virus after baboons diverged from other groups. I'm not sure what you're talking about or what it means, but I do get the feeling that, whatever it is, you're not the best one to explain it to me.
How do we know what "Neanderthal" genes are? Do we know the signature of Neanderthal DNA? I don't think so. So....until we know THAT, it might, or might not, be assumed that some DNA remnants remain.
I would think, logically I hope, that there would be some DNA remnants from any one of our hominid anscentors...at least, the most successful DNA-genes.
SOMEthing successful in our ancestral gene pool led us onward to homo sapiens.
George W. Bush will win reelection by a margin of at least ten per cent
Because mtDNA is matrilineal, it would be quite possible if some limited interbreeding happened once that some nuclear Neanderthal genes entered the human pool and are still around and yet the mtDNA lines dead-ended. You have to have an unbroken line of female descent to keep the mtDNA going.
Take some lone Neanderthal woman, the last of her tribe, adopted in some Homo sapiens village long ago. She has three sons and three daughters. Only the daughters carry her Neanderthal mtDNA. Only their own daughters will carry it, and their daughters, etc. Male descents and female descendants alike can spread Neanderthal nuclear genes, but only female descendants from an unbroken line going back to the original Ugly Mama carry the mtDNA. The mtDNA line is thus very vulnerable to extinction if the original seeding into the human population is limited.
The evidence for interbreeding is thus weak overall. There's no positive genetic evidence and may never be any. There are a few controversial fossils with confusingly intermediate features. They may or may not show hybridism. If hybrids ever existed, we may or may not still have some of their genes. New finds would be helpful. Nuclear DNA from Neanderthals would be especially helpful.
Actually, the sons carry Mama's mtDNA too. They won't transmit it to their offspring. All the offspring of a daughter of a daughter of a daughter ... get the mt-genes, but only the girls pass them on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.