To: ckilmer; blam; SunkenCiv
4 posted on
09/20/2004 11:37:31 AM PDT by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
CIVILIZATION requires that the people can read and write their own language. There is no evidence that these people were literate, so it is more proper to refer to them as being a society, or a culture.
The term for people without civilation always has been savages; but this term now has a bad connotation, and writers are reluctant to use it even for peaceful, inoffensive groups.
5 posted on
09/20/2004 11:50:39 AM PDT by
docbnj
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fedora; Fiddlstix; ckilmer
Thanks Ernest. We've discussed this site before and I still have the same question. Why is everyone else in the area known as such & such Indians and this group is known as the Freemont People...Why aren't they known as the Freemont Indians? (Maybe they weren't Indians?)
14 posted on
09/20/2004 8:54:20 PM PDT by
blam
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson