Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Guillermo

"It's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge. Bush needs to answer the charges now."

And the answer is:

If there were any truth to the charges fake documents would not be necessary. When you know you have the truth on your side, there is no need to stoop to deception.


28 posted on 09/15/2004 4:57:32 AM PDT by WomanofStandard (Life is Hard, but God is Good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: WomanofStandard

"It's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge. Bush needs to answer the charges now."

The charges are not serious. That's what's bizarre about this. They are making something out of nothing and hoping the public is too stupid to understand.

All this is about is trumping up charges and putting the target under suspicion and on the defensive. It has nothing to do with truth and nothing to do with 'seriousness'.


100 posted on 09/15/2004 5:45:03 AM PDT by wiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: WomanofStandard
False documents = false charges.

Silly to answer a charge that has no basis in reality.

125 posted on 09/15/2004 6:04:42 AM PDT by slimer ("The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson