Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: finnman69

Here's my prediction:


"Some overzealous aide prepared these 'recreations' of memos seen by the aide but later destroyed accidentally. As 'recreations,' these memos should not have been presented as originals. However, as the content IS real, key questions to the Bush administration remain unanswered. That is all."


251 posted on 09/15/2004 7:56:34 AM PDT by Petronski (With what? Spitballs!?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

I think they may say something like that....

AND THEN...point out the Secretary from the Guard...
GIVING UNSUBSTANTIATED claims that the content was the same as what she had seen.

EVEN THOUGH...according to the Houston Chronicle....she said last week...that she had no first hand knowledge of anything like that.


262 posted on 09/15/2004 8:03:09 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

As I noted earlier, USA Today received the same memos plus two typed in the same manner independently from CBS or the WH.

Same typing.


280 posted on 09/15/2004 8:15:27 AM PDT by cyncooper (We're mad as Zell and we're not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

Bump


868 posted on 09/15/2004 10:02:33 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson