Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2banana
every knight's armor I have ever seen is built for smaller men - and they would have been the ones to live a "good" life.

Two things: the typical "knight's armor" of the period in discussion was a chain mail hauberk (thigh length shirt) and chausses (maille leggings). It would have been as unfitted as a sweatshirt, with a 3-4 inch height difference not readily noticeable. I am unsure if there are even any surviving intact Norman/Viking/Saxon hauberks.

Second, armor is often displayed on a rack that does not take into account the extra material and play at the joints. When you add up these, armor has a surprising amount of expandability.

94 posted on 05/14/2006 6:08:56 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana; Mr Rogers; Anitius Severinus Boethius

Oops. Didn't realize this was a two year old thread.


97 posted on 05/14/2006 6:30:47 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson