Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimSEA
"As I recall, wheat and millet were both grown in the region. However, I don't recall any dates for the wheat. Also, irrigation was an early intoduction there and to the west."

Yup. The whole area was much wetter then. The rivers were flowing with water from glacial melt that had accumulated for 100k years. Once all the glaciers melted, the region dried to a crisp.

9 posted on 08/07/2004 1:33:00 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: blam
Yup. The whole area was much wetter then. The rivers were flowing with water from glacial melt that had accumulated for 100k years. Once all the glaciers melted, the region dried to a crisp.

People once (as recently as early in the twentieth century) widely believed that "rain follows the plow," that human agriculture tended cause more rain in dry regions. I've lately noticed that, as part of the tendency to blame humans for all evil and all change, the more fashionable current variation is that "desert follows the plow." That is, in places like the Sahel of Africa and other regions once blooming but now dry, humans have caused something called "desertification" which otherwise would not happen.

Well, here and there humans do reroute the water from point A to point B, such as in the Aral Sea basin, changing things at least for a time. Also, humans are pumping up water from the Oglala undergound reservoir to (for time, until the finite supply of water runs out) make western Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma more fertile than they used to be. But I suspect that the net influence of humans on this kind of thing has not been large or permanent.

10 posted on 08/07/2004 1:46:44 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson