this paper is most likely a fabrication, furthermore Nidal was possibly killed by Saddam's people. The reason for this is not clear.
Do not put too much in the fact that Allawi thought this document was genuine, many had this opinion a year ago.
My question to you and everyone that writes off the Habboush al Tikriti memo as a forgery: Where is the conclusive debunking of this memo?
I don't want to hear about how it is "too convenient" that Niger is mentioned or any other slippery and meaningless logic.
If this was a forgery then it could be established by analysis of the ink, the paper, the handwriting, etc. Where is this analysis?
I can't find it on any Google search I have tried.
I'd say the memo should stand at its face value until it is conclusively disproven.
Mossad did a great job planting data that lead Saddam's son to believe Nidal was an Israeli double agent.
I would be highly interested in hearing your basis for saying so.