Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fedora
"The dating of these remains has been problematical with age estimates ranging between 11-26,000 YA. The Upper Cave remains have been said by some to show closer affinities to Upper Paleolithic Europeans rather than living Chinese. Other researchers, however, see the remains as representative of an East Asian "proto-Mongoloid " population."

Very interesting.

Mair said that during his searches dealing with the Tarim Mummies they came across human artifacts dated to 250,000 years ago in that region. (he just mentioned this in passing in his book)

50 posted on 03/31/2004 5:18:52 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: blam
Some more on that:

A History of China

About 25,000 B.C. there appears in North China a new human type, found in upper layers in the same caves that sheltered Peking Man. This type is beyond doubt not Mongoloid, and may have been allied to the Ainu, a non-Mongol race still living in northern Japan. These, too, were a palaeolithic people, though some of their implements show technical advance. Later they disappear, probably because they were absorbed into various populations of central and northern Asia. Remains of them have been found in badly explored graves in northern Korea.

4 The Neolithic age

In the period that now followed, northern China must have gradually become arid, and the formation of loess seems to have steadily advanced. There is once more a great gap in our knowledge until, about 4000 B.C., we can trace in North China a purely Mongoloid people with a neolithic culture.

60 posted on 03/31/2004 7:07:44 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson