It's called muzzling free speech. and it's not any more legal or right to do it, just because it offends you or me. We have no constitutional right to NOT be offended by what we hear in the public arena. on the contrary. Potentially being offended by others speech is the price we pay for our own right to speak our minds.
You have no right to NOT BE OFFENDED. Neither do I. That goes double when we are considering using the power of the FCC to do so, either through direct regulation or back door "persuasion".
At some point hillary types will say YOUR or MY stated position on issues lies beneath the level of civil discourse the law allows... and use power to stiffle us.
Then it will be too late. And from the comments I read here amongst us supposed conservatives, it already is.
Having said that, I never listen to howard and have found him repulsive in the past. I don't want him censored. I want to have the right to choose to listen to whomever I want, not have it sorted, censored and altered to fit ANY one group's perspectives on morality, right, wrong or practicality. Being an adult, I would rather maintain the right to change radio stations, without having them altered for me by nannystate lovers... of the left OR the right.
Yes, I agree. But you will reach a point where the large majority of people will revolt at what is called contemporary dialogue. The Lowest Common Denominator simply made a strategic mistake for their cause. Boobs on the tube and phony gay marriages are making folks very uncomfortable. In-your-face activities have finally reached the point at which they reap what they sow. The wheel turns. People have been awakened and are aware.