[Enlightiator]

But you repeat yourself:)

And may I say in kind, being an evolutionist means "one who continuosly evolves theory under the broad label 'evolution' to fit the latest contradictory evidence." I know, I know, thats science. But just don't pretend you're on "holy ground" with your theory of the day!

[Central Scrutiniser]

Scientists change when they have tangible proof, creationists work from the same unending script, oblivious to any science or new data.

[Ichneumon]

And may I say in kind, being an evolutionist means "one who continuosly evolves theory under the broad label 'evolution' to fit the latest contradictory evidence."

You may "say" that, but it doesn't make it true, and in fact it is not, although it's a common urban legend among creationists.

Just for fun though, do please grace us with your "history of evolutionary science" which delineates the alleged "rewrites" of the theory and the alleged "contradictory evidence".

I know, I know, thats science.

Your straw man description actually bears little resemblance to actual evolutionary science.

But just don't pretend you're on "holy ground" with your theory of the day!

Feel free to describe for us the the last "day" when evolutionary theory allegedly had to be revised.

And science doesn't make the mistake of claiming "holy ground". It leaves that fallacy for people in other fields to make.

Instead, science only claims that its theories are based on mountains of evidence and have been verified countless times in a myriad of ways, and produces workable results like jet fighters, digital computers, and designer pharmaceuticals. I'll take that over declarations of "holy ground" any time.