To: RaceBannon
Absolutely, yes. At least so long as the homeschoolers parents have to pay property taxes to support the public achools, even though they are smart enough not to want to send their kids to them!
3 posted on
11/29/2003 7:13:04 PM PST by
RANGERAIRBORNE
("It is terrible to contemplate how FEW politicians are hanged" G.K. Chesterton, `921)
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Absolutely no!, why represent a school on a sports team, when the athelete does'nt even attend the school????, whats the point of teams representing their schools? If a home schoolers wants to use the facilities fine, but to be allowed on a school team, when not even attending the schools is nonsense!
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
The fact the kid is homeschooled reduces the funds the school receives, doesn't it? So the homeschooled kid is consuming resources that aren't paid for. I guess. This is the first I've heard of the problem, anyway.
72 posted on
11/30/2003 11:39:56 AM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Absolutely, yes. At least so long as the homeschoolers parents have to pay property taxes to support the public achools, even though they are smart enough not to want to send their kids to them! And even if they don't. Libs say everyone is entitled to a free education, this is part of their education.
83 posted on
12/01/2003 5:30:12 AM PST by
FrdmLvr
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson