Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
My post #7 was for you.
8 posted on 11/11/2003 8:35:18 AM PST by Semper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Semper
"We do need political upheaval however"

I know you mis-directed your #7 to me, however:

IMO, what we need is polarization that places Constitutional Conservatives in one party and Liberals/ Moderates/Neo-Conservatives in one party.
Having a mix of political philosophies in parties allows a takeover of a given party as has happened to the republican party and democrat parties.

In the republican case we have "pretend" conservatives and in the democrat party we have a takeover of the leadership by leftists/socialists. In both instances, they spend, spend, spend & tax, tax, tax except the neo-cons give us an occasional cookie of small tax breaks, but, on the whole, all we get from both parties is "crumbs".

Consider the obscene NEW spending of the administration and their acceptance of the democrat's domestic aganda, i,e,; Their "Education" bill, Adding new airport security personnel (more than 60,000 New employees) on the taxpayers backs instead of turning it over to private enterprise, the acceptance of the dem's positions of giveing lawbreakers amnesty and citizenship, their silence on California's driver licenses for illegals, etc,. etc.,.

Bottom line, we have Different names, Different approaches, Same results. Here in Kaleefornia, the "conservatives" abandoned their announced "core beliefs" and voted for a guy who is diametrically opposed not only to their supposed core beliefs, but, also the Republican Platform, just so they could have a victory. Can you say, political whores?





9 posted on 11/11/2003 9:19:05 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson