The downside would be assault charges, I guess. With the number of dem-wits who've been running their mouths lately, President Bush would be rolling in campaign cash and the 'dirty sock gang' would be praying to get a judge that wasn't pushing an agenda.
>> The downside would be assault charges, I guess.
Not at all. Stuffing dirty socks into a politician's mouth is a fundamental right of all upstanding citizens and is constitutionally well protected by our freedom of speech, freedom of religion and the unwashed hosiery clause.