Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate Heats Up On Role Of Climate In Human Evolution
Eurekalert ^ | 11-3-2003 | Geological Society Of America

Posted on 11/03/2003 7:52:15 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: blam
Hot weather and tight pants produce inferior sperm.
21 posted on 11/03/2003 8:47:26 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Ping! Possibly for your ping list?
22 posted on 11/03/2003 8:48:40 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam
If you currently don't have the technoligy to live with it, you beat feet. This would explain why Northern Africa got a head start on Northern Europe. Also, Northern Europe may have been more advanced than we think. When you build things out of wood they just don't last as long as things built out of limestone. Then there is no record to show you were there.
23 posted on 11/03/2003 8:51:57 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Just plain Wootten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
I ran into a claim about five years ago in "Discover" magazine that the human race could be attributed to ... Panama.

The theory was that a long time ago, there was no Isthmus of Panama, and some ocean current flowed through the gap between North and South America from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean.

When the Isthmus of Panama rose from the sea, this current was deflected back into the Atlantic, toward Africa. As a result, Africa became cooler and more humid, somehow favoring the rise of homo sapiens.

24 posted on 11/03/2003 9:25:59 PM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
"The theory was that a long time ago, there was no Isthmus of Panama, and some ocean current flowed through the gap between North and South America from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean."

I think that was in the millions of years ago...not positive though. (I would like to know if you find out for sure...I could work with that, lol)

25 posted on 11/03/2003 9:31:07 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
No scientist would ever use such an ignorant term as "human evolution."

That's going to come as a big surprise to the scientists who publish and submit articles to scientific journals such as:

...or those scientists who publish such papers as:

Tracing the LINEs of human evolution (Igor Ovchinnikov, Adrienne Rubin, and Gary D. Swergold) [Excellent paper]

A Review of Sexual Selection and Human Evolution: How Mate Choice shaped Human Nature

Alu Insertion Polymorphisms and Human Evolution: Evidence for a Larger Population Size in Africa (Mark Stoneking, Jennifer J. Fontius, Stephanie L. Clifford, Himla Soodyall, Santosh S. Arcot, Nilmani Saha, Trefor Jenkins, Mohammad A. Tahir, Prescott L. Deininger, and Mark A. Batzer)

Human evolution: Sex-specific contributions to genome variation (Todd R. Disotell)

Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution (John Hawks, Keith Hunley, Sang-Hee Lee, and Milford Wolpoff)

Transitions in human evolution and faunal changes during the Pleistocene in Latium (Central Italy) (G. Manzi1, M.R. Palombo, L. Caloi, F. Mallegni)

And so on and so on.

Evolution is not science,

Of course it is, but you're welcome to try to offer an argument why you think it isn't, if you actually have one.

it is the ignorant religion of the God haters.

That's going to come as a big surprise to the millions of Christians who accept evolution.

Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.

Ooh, this ought to be interesting -- why don't you provide us some specific examples of the "objective science" which "proves" that creation is an "undeniable fact"?

26 posted on 11/03/2003 9:40:46 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
YEC INTREP
27 posted on 11/03/2003 9:52:42 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
I sure wish I had read the book on how mate choices shaped human nature before I met my second ex wife.
28 posted on 11/03/2003 9:55:11 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Just plain Wootten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam
What were the drivers that may have nudged hominids toward bi-pedalism?

See any book by Elaine Goodman, The Aquatic Ape, Descent from Woman, etc.

29 posted on 11/04/2003 12:07:02 AM PST by rightofrush (right of Rush, and Buchanan too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
30 posted on 11/04/2003 3:11:14 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Except civilizations arose initially in two relatively benign areas along the banks of major rivers...
31 posted on 11/04/2003 3:28:29 AM PST by Junior ("Your superior intellects are no match for our puny weapons!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
32 posted on 11/04/2003 8:12:33 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Civilization requires grain storage, or some equivalent.
33 posted on 11/04/2003 8:39:49 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
You have to note also that the more advanced cultures seem to be where there was the most change. They had to be smart to survive.

Conversely, in extant primitive societies there hasn't been the environmental pressure over time to enforce change. Their technology required few tweakings and cultural practices remained essentially static.

34 posted on 11/04/2003 8:49:05 AM PST by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the heads up!
35 posted on 11/04/2003 8:59:00 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: blam
What were the drivers that may have nudged hominids toward bi-pedalism?

It seems to me that we've discussed this before.

36 posted on 11/04/2003 8:59:54 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanz
Which is why some cultures get left behind.
37 posted on 11/04/2003 10:45:45 AM PST by U S Army EOD (Just plain Wootten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
Their misfortune for having been assimilated into Western encroachment.
38 posted on 11/04/2003 11:09:24 AM PST by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The Cold Snap That Civilized The World
39 posted on 11/04/2003 11:24:08 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stanz
This is probably true. But, would it be any more moral if they did it to us first? If you aren't willing to utilize the land you are on to the benefit of mankind in general, should you be allowed to keep it? Should we give the Stonehendge area back to the Picts?
40 posted on 11/04/2003 12:40:29 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Just plain Wootten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson