Skip to comments.
Debate Heats Up On Role Of Climate In Human Evolution
Eurekalert ^
| 11-3-2003
| Geological Society Of America
Posted on 11/03/2003 7:52:15 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: blam
Hot weather and tight pants produce inferior sperm.
21
posted on
11/03/2003 8:47:26 PM PST
by
Consort
To: PatrickHenry
Ping! Possibly for your ping list?
To: blam
If you currently don't have the technoligy to live with it, you beat feet. This would explain why Northern Africa got a head start on Northern Europe. Also, Northern Europe may have been more advanced than we think. When you build things out of wood they just don't last as long as things built out of limestone. Then there is no record to show you were there.
23
posted on
11/03/2003 8:51:57 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(Just plain Wootten)
To: blam
I ran into a claim about five years ago in "Discover" magazine that the human race could be attributed to ... Panama.
The theory was that a long time ago, there was no Isthmus of Panama, and some ocean current flowed through the gap between North and South America from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean.
When the Isthmus of Panama rose from the sea, this current was deflected back into the Atlantic, toward Africa. As a result, Africa became cooler and more humid, somehow favoring the rise of homo sapiens.
24
posted on
11/03/2003 9:25:59 PM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(...and Freedom tastes of Reality.)
To: DuncanWaring
"The theory was that a long time ago, there was no Isthmus of Panama, and some ocean current flowed through the gap between North and South America from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean." I think that was in the millions of years ago...not positive though. (I would like to know if you find out for sure...I could work with that, lol)
25
posted on
11/03/2003 9:31:07 PM PST
by
blam
To: editor-surveyor
No scientist would ever use such an ignorant term as "human evolution." That's going to come as a big surprise to the scientists who publish and submit articles to scientific journals such as:
...or those scientists who publish such papers as:
Tracing the LINEs of human evolution (Igor Ovchinnikov, Adrienne Rubin, and Gary D. Swergold) [Excellent paper]A Review of Sexual Selection and Human Evolution: How Mate Choice shaped Human Nature
Alu Insertion Polymorphisms and Human Evolution: Evidence for a Larger Population Size in Africa (Mark Stoneking, Jennifer J. Fontius, Stephanie L. Clifford, Himla Soodyall, Santosh S. Arcot, Nilmani Saha, Trefor Jenkins, Mohammad A. Tahir, Prescott L. Deininger, and Mark A. Batzer)
Human evolution: Sex-specific contributions to genome variation (Todd R. Disotell)
Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution (John Hawks, Keith Hunley, Sang-Hee Lee, and Milford Wolpoff)
Transitions in human evolution and faunal changes during the Pleistocene in Latium (Central Italy) (G. Manzi1, M.R. Palombo, L. Caloi, F. Mallegni)
And so on and so on.
Evolution is not science,
Of course it is, but you're welcome to try to offer an argument why you think it isn't, if you actually have one.
it is the ignorant religion of the God haters.
That's going to come as a big surprise to the millions of Christians who accept evolution.
Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.
Ooh, this ought to be interesting -- why don't you provide us some specific examples of the "objective science" which "proves" that creation is an "undeniable fact"?
To: blam
YEC INTREP
To: Ichneumon
I sure wish I had read the book on how mate choices shaped human nature before I met my second ex wife.
28
posted on
11/03/2003 9:55:11 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(Just plain Wootten)
To: blam
What were the drivers that may have nudged hominids toward bi-pedalism?See any book by Elaine Goodman, The Aquatic Ape, Descent from Woman, etc.
29
posted on
11/04/2003 12:07:02 AM PST
by
rightofrush
(right of Rush, and Buchanan too.)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
30
posted on
11/04/2003 3:11:14 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: blam
Except civilizations arose initially in two relatively benign areas along the banks of major rivers...
31
posted on
11/04/2003 3:28:29 AM PST
by
Junior
("Your superior intellects are no match for our puny weapons!")
To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
To: Junior
Civilization requires grain storage, or some equivalent.
33
posted on
11/04/2003 8:39:49 AM PST
by
js1138
To: U S Army EOD
You have to note also that the more advanced cultures seem to be where there was the most change. They had to be smart to survive. Conversely, in extant primitive societies there hasn't been the environmental pressure over time to enforce change. Their technology required few tweakings and cultural practices remained essentially static.
34
posted on
11/04/2003 8:49:05 AM PST
by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the heads up!
To: blam
To: stanz
Which is why some cultures get left behind.
37
posted on
11/04/2003 10:45:45 AM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(Just plain Wootten)
To: U S Army EOD
Their misfortune for having been assimilated into Western encroachment.
38
posted on
11/04/2003 11:09:24 AM PST
by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: js1138
39
posted on
11/04/2003 11:24:08 AM PST
by
blam
To: stanz
This is probably true. But, would it be any more moral if they did it to us first? If you aren't willing to utilize the land you are on to the benefit of mankind in general, should you be allowed to keep it? Should we give the Stonehendge area back to the Picts?
40
posted on
11/04/2003 12:40:29 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(Just plain Wootten)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson