To: JohnHuang2
I think the President should move to cut spending by vetoing bills and drive the Democrats crazy by announcing more tax cuts. Let the other side be the tax and spend party.
2 posted on
10/27/2003 11:56:30 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: JohnHuang2
President Bush will likely be forced into a budget deal involving higher taxes Has it been brought upon him by his own hand which cannot pick up a veto Pen?
To: JohnHuang2
I will, unless something changes, not even bother to vote in 2004.
I can't vote against Bush, but I can't vote for him either.
As usual, I'll take care of myself and will not wait for government or my representatives to do the right thing.
I'm not afraid of the terrorist and I'm not worried about the economy or my income. Bush has to earn my trust and so far he's coming up short.
4 posted on
10/28/2003 12:01:33 AM PST by
Fledermaus
(I'm a conservative...not necessarily a Republican.)
To: JohnHuang2
Of course he will increase taxes. He's spending our money and giving GRANTS like a drunken sailor. And, his obscene spending spree will be defended by the defenders of the indefensible come 2004.
5 posted on
10/28/2003 12:07:09 AM PST by
poet
To: JohnHuang2
I remember the Reagan "taxes" as closing "loop-holes." The marginal rates of 50-70% before Reagan carried some off-sets in the deduction columns.
But the purpose of raising taxes is to continue or increase spending - which is and has been out-of-control on the Federal level.
8 posted on
10/28/2003 1:45:32 AM PST by
The Raven
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson