Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bannon: Trump will win reelection with '400 electoral votes'
The Hill ^ | October 14, 2017 | Josh Delk

Posted on 10/14/2017 7:34:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Demoncats assemble the usual group of thugs and liars as nominees you can take this to the bank.


41 posted on 10/14/2017 9:29:21 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Probably he heard criticism from it, so he’s changing his tune. Otherwise, he has different messages to different papers. Ted Cruz frequently said different things to various newspapers than what he was willing to say to “conservative” media. It’s like they don’t know we have the internet and thus can read everything from everywhere.


42 posted on 10/14/2017 9:36:03 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“he would have won 400 EV this election had not CRUZ and a large number of NeverTrumpers all but endorsed Hillary”

Exactly when do the Cruz haters plan to bury the hatchet?

Trump won with a lot of help from Cruz supporters.

Cruz was the most solid conservative running. He has a proven track record.

Now it turns out that Trump is building a similarly conservative track record by keeping his promises.

Trump got over Cruz very quickly, but certain people seem to be obsessed with attacking him.

Time to wake up out of your hypnotic spell. The election is over. It is time to work together. Cruz supports Trump’s agenda. This is why he is the ONLY senator up for reelection that Bannon will support.

If we could replace all the RINOs with conservatives like Cruz, Trump would probably get every single thing he wants done in a timely fashion. And Obamacare would have been history during his first few weeks in office.


43 posted on 10/14/2017 9:36:39 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Well Bannon has sense enough to know that Trump needs legislators like Cruz. As many as he can get.

And Texas conservatives are going to send Cruz back again. We need to get rid of the RINOs, not the conservatives.


44 posted on 10/14/2017 9:39:21 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Hell, he would have won 400 EV this election had not CRUZ and a large number of NeverTrumpers all but endorsed Hillary, with many of them thinking that Trump would govern as a Leftist, given his history.

You have great faith in Ted Cruz.

I think it was more suburban Romney Republicans who defected or stayed home.

No, I don't mean Romney masterminded the whole thing.

I mean Ted Cruz and Cruzites don't amount to much nationally.

Trump won because he was able to pick up votes in liberal Democrat states.

The Cruz voters were in states Trump had already won, states that Republicans always win.

45 posted on 10/14/2017 9:44:45 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would say this...the only possible Democratic winner is some black somewhat unknown political figure who plays out the Obama-scenario....is a gifted speaker...and picks up a lot of black votes which didn’t occur in 2016 with Hillary.

I don’t see Cory Booker having much luck in the south. Eric Holder is a one-state winner in the primary at best. Julian Castro could win three or four primary states but he’s not polished enough yet. Maybe Bernie runs again and you might have a somewhat interesting race against Trump. Kamala Harris is more or less a joke and would be more or less a younger version of Hillary (at least healthy).


46 posted on 10/14/2017 9:53:28 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

LOL

400 is NOT doable!! Maybe 320!

47 posted on 10/14/2017 10:00:01 PM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
I would say this...the only possible Democratic winner is some black somewhat unknown political figure who plays out the Obama-scenario....is a gifted speaker...and picks up a lot of black votes which didn’t occur in 2016 with Hillary.


I read that Hillary did max out the Black vote in places like MI or PA, correct me if I'm wrong

48 posted on 10/14/2017 10:03:09 PM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Karl Rove hates Bannon.


49 posted on 10/14/2017 10:13:57 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-will-win-2020-election-400-electoral-votes-bannon-claims-685120

10/14/17

Steve Bannon has a message for “the good folks at Vanity Fair”, stating Donald Trump will “not only finish his term” but gain a landslide 400 electoral votes in the 2020 presidential election.

Speaking at the controversial Family Research Council’s Values Voter Summit, Bannon hit back at a report from Vanity Fair that suggested he did not have any faith that his former boss would finish out his first term.

The former White House chief strategist said on Saturday in comments carried by ABC News: “The populist, nationalist, conservative revolt that’s going on, that drove Donald Trump to victory, that drove Judge Moore to victory, that will drive 15 candidates to victory in 2018, and well, I hate to break the news to Graydon Carter and the good folks at Vanity Fair, but yes, President Trump is not only going to finish this term he’s going to win with 400 electoral votes in 2020.”


50 posted on 10/14/2017 10:14:50 PM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

No, Trump lost by over 212,000 votes in this state and is becoming more democrat by the week. There is a huge influx of libs in Northern Virginia where 20 to 25% of the vote comes from. With the exception of Richmond and Tidewater, Trump dominated in the rest of the state, but the votes are in the urban areas. Trump received only about a third of the vote in Fairfax County, the largest jurisdiction in the state and it was just too much for the rest of the state to make up.


51 posted on 10/14/2017 10:40:20 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
Drudge links to articles. Drudge does not write articles. He links to existing articles on other websites. We click on the links and can read the article he is linking to. We then make up our own mind as to whether it is believable or not. Why is this so hard to understand?

You are aware Drudge is an aggregator and not a reporter?

52 posted on 10/14/2017 10:45:49 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: KavMan

In the case of Michigan....particularly around Detroit, I think she got 104-percent of the black vote (city officials tried to audit some of the voting books and found too many discrepancies to say with any accuracy that legal voting occurred). Outside of Detroit, it’s a different story. Just outside of Detroit, in Livingston County...Trump won with a 30-point lead. Monroe County (to the south of Detroit) was a 22-point win for Trump. I think if the legal voting had been done in Detroit...Hillary would have seen at least 20,000 lesser votes.

In the Penn, I think the urban black vote came out. There are however, only four counties where Hillary had double-digit wins. The non-urban vote didn’t come out for Hillary as you look at the rest of the state. On the western side of Penn, you see a dozen counties with double-digit point differences between Trump and Hillary. She had zero chance in those counties.

The disconnect for her national vote is that she could only mount serious voting numbers in urbanized areas. She couldn’t attract the rural or non-urban vote. You see this problem in the Iowa Caucus in 2008 and 2016...her theme and message just didn’t work. No one has really sat down and talked to working-class blacks about their votes, and I suspect that a fair number number went to Trump.

My brother brought this up to a couple of the security guards in his company one day before the primary day in the state. They were black, retired Army, and normally die-hard Democrats, from a southern state. In the spring of 2016, they were sold on Trump’s message. The reason? They’d seen the job shift in the 1990s, and fewer jobs for everyone (especially for blacks). In their mind, only Trump could bring back jobs. I think a fair number of working-class Blacks went this direction.


53 posted on 10/14/2017 10:50:00 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump I support you 100%, I was one of your earliest supporters right here om FR, but you really have not kept your pledges to bring back American trade/American jobs once again.

We run a MASSIVE trade imbalance with China. Huge. It has been getting worse every single year, for more than the entire last generation.

Both Republican presidents, and democratic presidents have sold out to China. Year after year. Now we are buying everything, it seems, from China.

If I go into any Walmart in America. Pick five things at random. The odds are (very) high, that all five things were imported from China.

I go into any Target in America. Same result. Any KMart in America. Same result. We have sent masses of industry, which was formerly American, to China. More all of the time.

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html

I know we get stuff cheap from China, but we are sacrificing our very own manufacturing capabilities.

Not good, in the long run. Not good at all.


54 posted on 10/14/2017 10:51:35 PM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

You need to search the keyword “jobs” here at Free Republic. He is bringing jobs back to the United States. Tons of them.


55 posted on 10/14/2017 10:55:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not sure I agree with you.

Though I appreciate you being so enthusiastic.

We are importing everything, in every store, from China. That is not something we can do forever.

Might as well start right now, to bring jobs back to America.


56 posted on 10/14/2017 11:02:41 PM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

I read at least one whole article making the claim that Bannon supposedly said Trump may not finish his term. It was a fake news piece with unnamed sources.

IOW, lying bulls***.

No one should even pay attention to lying fake news using “unnamed sources”. It’s made up.


57 posted on 10/14/2017 11:04:48 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cba123

You need to read more. Tons of jobs happening. Employment way, way up.


58 posted on 10/14/2017 11:06:53 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cba123

It takes more than 6 months to change sources and supply chains. If by this time in 2019 nothing has changed then you’ll have a somewhat valid point.


59 posted on 10/14/2017 11:08:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

New York

Trump could definitely win NY in 2020. Upstate plus Staten island, Sussex, Nassau, and Queens whups Brooklyn, Manhattan, The Bronx, and Albany county.


60 posted on 10/14/2017 11:10:51 PM PDT by vooch (America First Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson