> “In Michigan, Trump won by 11,000 votes. But there were 85,000 ‘blank votes’ in which people voted for other races but they left the presidential race blank. That is far higher than any election in history.”
So people that couldn’t vote for Clinton and also couldn’t vote for Trump are now the target?
Hasn’t a second hand count already been done in Michigan as per procedure?
> “A hand count of the ballots could determine if the box was merely checked, but the oval not filled in. If so, it will be counted. This can make a difference in the outcome.”
A third hand count?
There it is. The window is open to check, scratch, tear, smudge over Clinton’s oval and the democrat criminals will call it as a vote for her.
There will be Trump people watching but are they really in the Trump camp? Will they be distracted or confused by design or intention?
Trump will file a request to deny the recount. If the Michigan SOS dismisses the request, we will know the fix is in.
I wish I could say something positive but unfortunately, I witnessed firsthand how they steal elections twice in the 2000s in my state, one for Governor and one for US Senator.
Once seen, it is impossible to hand wave away these emerging developments. I almost wish I wasn’t ‘wise’.
DV, comment welcome; I think MI’s ballot counters know how many unfilled-in-for-president ballots there are, from their recent certification.
If on the recount, there are suddenly enough filled-in-for-president ballots to tip MI, then Katie bar the door ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3499194/posts?page=21#21