Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

I like your idea, but if I were Trump, I might use the debate format to attack Hillary with a bill of particulars as you suggest. He would have a much larger audience, and she would have to lose that irritating smile or its falsity would become even more apparent. Pretty much any question can be turned against her. Any question on foreign policy could be turned onto the disaster that is Libya, Syria and the Russian reset. A “woman’s issue?” Her disgraceful treatment of Paula, Jennifer, Kathleen, and Monica. Trump’s taxes? I’m pretty sure the Clintons must have some interesting deductions or capital losses on their returns. Tax policy? Increased rates hurt the middle class not rich folks like the Clintons, who can afford fancy lawyers and accountants. National defense? She was the one who put the nation at risk by putting its secrets on an unsecured server and then obstructed justice by having her underlings bleachbit it. Income inequality? She’s the one who made speeches to Goldman Sachs at a quarter million a pop, which speeches she now will not release. It would not be difficult,


39 posted on 10/04/2016 12:55:49 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: p. henry
I think yours is an improvement on my idea providing Trump can muster the self-discipline to learn his lines, that is, to have his facts and the manner of expressing them totally at his disposal so that he will not be rattled and so that he does not lose his cool.

I still maintain, the issues you have outlined are powerful but demeanor at this point is everything.


42 posted on 10/04/2016 1:01:22 AM PDT by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson