Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilanteman

Somebody - I think Krauthammer - was talking about this poll the other day - said to view it with some caution - apparently they have the same pool of 30,000 people which they draw randomly from over and over for their results - usually not advisable to repeat sample for something like this since decisions on a candidate once made are likely not to change - might be better to take independent samples which should reflect changes in voter sentiment over time more accurately.....


100 posted on 07/29/2016 5:41:17 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Intolerant in NJ

That’s a good point. We need to wait for a better poll. However, it’s likely that most polling groups are busy fudging their numbers. Hillary must have a bump at all costs.


101 posted on 07/29/2016 5:51:12 PM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson