Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats fear that violent anti-Trump protesters are only helping him
The Washington Post ^ | June 3, 2016 | Jose A. DelReal and Sean Sullivan

Posted on 06/04/2016 9:25:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Everyone is scared to say it? Just calling them protestors, ignoring the big piñata in the room: USA HAS AN ILLEGAL ALIEN PROBLEM. They bring their third world violence here. Only seeking the welfare benefits, with no desire to assimilate and be a real citizen of US. Caught up in the racist organization, la Raza and la Raza’s propaganda lie about taking back USA.

In any case, a great campaign ad for Trump as people in California hate la raza and they are displaying behavior that is the cause of why they are HATED.

Send the violent Mexican Patriots back to Mexico. Deport.


41 posted on 06/04/2016 10:20:58 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Indeed they are. In 2012 a group of black men rolled up on a very long early voting line to sell o tee shirts. I reported them because it offends me to see something that is sacred turned into a flea market. Next thing I knew I was surrounded by ghetto types who were in my space and screaming in my face. The black security guard that the SOE office provided came back to investigate and left without doing a thing when he saw what was going on. Thank God my friends showed up right after that and yes did I do cutsies for them.

For some reason the left sees manners as a weakness. They think that screaming, theats, and beat downs will stop us. But we aren’t stopping this time and they are about to find out what happens when manners are put on hold.


42 posted on 06/04/2016 10:28:48 AM PDT by lovesdogs (Think Trump won't make Mexico pay for the wall? Hillary's running pro Trump ads on her dime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dead

Trump brings out the true character in people. Must be from his decades of honing negotiating skills. Meghan the blond bombshell is now Meghan the biotch. Cruz the maverick is now Cruz the trophy husband. Beck the intellectual is now Beck the Cheetos Clown. Romney the Republican is now Romney the Hillary supporter. Mexican illegals seeking a new life are now Mexican bandits pillaging and raping. And on and on. Been amazing to watch the phony masks come off and their true self revealed. Guess a good negotiator first has to know what they are negotiating with.


43 posted on 06/04/2016 10:32:40 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
Re: 27
Paul Cicala’s statement on Tweet: I would like to sincerely apologize to anyone offended by a Tweet I made last night.

Cicala really dumped his 'apology' into the crapper with those 4 words: "to anyone offended by..."

Basically it is a non-apology apology. This apology is not for something he recognized that he did wrong - but to assuage those that might have been offended. And to save his job.

Strike those 4 words out (and replace "by" with "for") and it would have sounded sincere. He made a semi-reasonable attempt to fake sincerity, but he failed.

44 posted on 06/04/2016 10:33:56 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

It didn’t happen. They are lying. How many times have white, middle class Americans gone out in mobs looking for trouble? Not in my lifetime.


45 posted on 06/04/2016 10:37:57 AM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Better than the usual lefty non-apologies.

I agree, it was 'better', but it was still a non-apology. He poisoned it with his lead in: "to anyone offended by". If he left that part out it would have at least sounded sincere (faked, or not).

46 posted on 06/04/2016 10:38:56 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

That kind of incendiary conversation and tone that he has set ...that’s what’s inspiring this reaction, not the Democratic Party.”

To the leftists any conversation that does not agree with them is considered incendiary.

Trump has proposed America security by temporarily banning Muslim Immigrants (not tourists) and building a wall to stop the flood of illigals and drugs.

Unbelievable that these coming sense ideas are considered incendiary and worthy of riots.


47 posted on 06/04/2016 10:44:16 AM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
But unlike several violent eruptions earlier this spring, when the attacks were mostly carried out by Trump supporters against protesters...

The good olde Washington ComPost. They like to play the moral equivalency game of comparing jaywalking to murder - if it supports their agenda. The 'Trump attacks', were when rude disrupters entered a Trump event, and they were manhandled when they were shown the door. Here you have people attending an event and getting attacked for no other reason because these Bolsheviks and their useless idiots hate them. These Trump supporters were not disrupting Bolshevik events, they were minding their own business - yet they were attacked. And the Media (and San Jose Mayor) give them cover.

48 posted on 06/04/2016 10:44:53 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In the story of the scorpion and the frog, democrat supporters can always be likened to the scorpion.


49 posted on 06/04/2016 10:46:07 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Best to avoid direct conflict for now. We can hit them where it hurts the most. The pocketbook. Fire your illegals or demand that a business only employ US citizens. The goal right now is no martial law as it always should be. We need control of the White House before serious change can be accomplished. To fight in the streets will only bring out the National Guard. At any rate there are ways to get back under the radar. My guess is we are being setup for a McVeigh type of attack against these demonstrators. Now to predict what John Doe #2 will look like. Hmmmm.


50 posted on 06/04/2016 10:47:11 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Didn’t obama once instruct his obots to “get in their faces” when describing his preferred method for advocating for governmenthealthcare?


51 posted on 06/04/2016 10:49:38 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The only time I saw a Trump supporter defend himself or herself was against a democrat agitator and all they used was pepper spray to keep the democrat ar bay!


52 posted on 06/04/2016 10:52:17 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozy

My son is thinking about switching his vote from crazy Bernie to trump...as for me and hubby our vote is for AMERICA!! Make America great again!!! God bless mr trump!!


53 posted on 06/04/2016 10:53:54 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

But unlike several violent eruptions earlier this spring, when the attacks were mostly carried out by Trump supporters against protesters, young anti-Trump protesters have been the assailants at several recent events....

Really? Never heard of those. Was a Trump supporter defending himself? We know how the media would turn that around.


54 posted on 06/04/2016 11:25:26 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

The agents provocateur dogging Trump rally are useful idiots meant as cannon fodder, with the intent of capture on video any response, especially armed response by a Trump supporter.


55 posted on 06/04/2016 11:32:59 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“Democrats fear” that the attacks on The Donald may turn out to benefit his standing?

I say to the Democrats, “Be afraid. Be very, very afraid,”

Did the Democrats not see what happened to so many of the Republican rivals during the primary season? So long as no direct attack was raised against The Donald, he pretty much ignored them. But once they went beyond simply stating what they thought would be “good policy”, and countered The Donald directly, he would unleash unshirted hell upon them, and this was usually accompanied by a succinct nickname, which became shorthand for his references to that rival from then on.

Herself and Bernie both have gone far beyond talking about why they would think their policies (many of which have never been explicitly stated by either one of them) would be better for the US than the still somewhat sketchy program The Donald has laid out for “making America great again”.

Supposedly, the programs of either Herself or Bernie would expand on the policies of the past eight years, while most of what The Donald has in mind is on the order of “repeal and replace”. Clearly diametrically opposite, but neither Herself or Bernie are making much progress in explaining just what those policies ARE, only that “Trump is BAD”.

Not an intellectually stimulating discussion, as this is exactly the kind of attack that The Donald can deal with so spectacularly well.


56 posted on 06/04/2016 11:34:44 AM PDT by alloysteel (The Triumph of Trump - finally, does the hegemony of the Republican elites get broken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
[Dems] fearing that the incidents — widely viewed on television and social media — will only help the GOP candidate and undermine their attempts to defeat him.

Dems, Liberals and their brethren -- Homofascist mobs, La Raza mobs, Black Nationalist #BLM mobs, Union mobs, Mooselimb mobs, etal -- don't "fear" their own identity as violent, out-of-control barbarians; just the truth of the matter that TV news and a social media expose. Like a beacon scattering the zombie-cockroaches for who and what they are: DEMOCRATS.

America will not soon forget recent images and those still to come. THEY are finally identified America's problem.

The bad news in recognizing their image problem is the possibility that to counter it with an antidote, the Dem Machine will concoct a terrible False Flag event that just happens to focus on the inevitable caricature: "A gun-toting white, conservative Republican Trump-supporter."

57 posted on 06/04/2016 12:12:53 PM PDT by HangUpNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Trump’s masterful use of the verbal rope-a-dope against the heavy-handed media, has limited their ability to form an effective strategy to undermine his campaign. The media strategy then shifted toward smears against the Trump supporters.

Recent video increasingly undermines their narrative, leading to the inescapable conclusion that Trump opponents seem unabashedly Anti-American and the true perpetrators of the violence outside multiple political rally.

Taking hits to wear down your opponent, biding time for a winning gambit to be employed, is often distasteful. Some will look down upon the strategy and pronounce a judgement of weakness.

Resisting the urge to escalate response against hostile provocateurs, denies MSM video to paint supporters of Trump as the aggressors; and, video of suffering abuse in support of your cause, seems to appeal to the younger voters considering a switch to supporting Trump.

Moral of story, be nice until it’s time not to be nice; as, winning the big prize first enables needed remedies to follow suit.


58 posted on 06/04/2016 1:08:10 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Of course it’s helping Trump but there’s nothing they can do about it.
It’s the nature of leftists to be violent.


59 posted on 06/04/2016 1:09:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Maybe you could post your thoughts on the violence from the left side.


60 posted on 06/04/2016 1:28:26 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Bill Kristallnacht wants to burn down the conservative movement & elect crooked/lying Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson