Posted on 04/22/2016 2:32:50 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Laz, I think that train has left the station...
I think Trump will shake it off.
LOL. Yes, and to honest, he’s a commentator like 1,000 others who gets a Golden Sacks sponsored paycheck to destroy Trump. In a few more months his writing gig will end and you’ll see him working the fresh produce isles of your local grocery store.
Dead State?
“I know the difference between a man and a woman.”
LOL, on the contrary, your remarks quite obviously indicate you do not know the differences between a man and a woman, and you would consequently find yourself in a ticklish dilemma when finally being forced to make a determination with your blue gloved hands and smart looking TSA uniform. Yes, I can see it now as you are confronted with a choice you’d rather not make.
“Or should it be the rule that people should use whichever room they like, regardless of biology?”
That’s the problem with your comments, you flunked Human biology.
“But don’t tell me that Trump will stand up for America and everything that is important when he can’t even stand up to the Bathroom Bullies.”
ROFLMAO, I’d hate to see what Cruz “stood up” for, especially after those published reports of Cruz crossdressing as a girl to get into the girls’ dorms to play Peeping Tom and hanging around in the dorm hallway around the young women in a smoking jacket robe. Imagine the optics of those encounters replayed on the campaign trail tomorrow!
I like this part....
“Congratulations Ted Cruz for winning the Republican Nomination for President.”
But he forgot to add...”and a GUARANTEED loser in November! Hello President Hillary Clinton!”
Those 3 issues represent the priorities we seek. Trump brings a credible strength to the task.
That I can tell you.
Somehow we had Mens and Ladies Rooms for hundreds of years without having any blue gloved TSA agents checking genitals.
Cruz thinks that the traditional approach was perfectly cromulent. 99.97% of the population knows where to go, and when you have a man in the Women's Room, you tell him to get the hell out. If he absolutely refuses, you all the cops. It has been this way all along.
Trump thinks the traditional approach should be tossed out because it is too much trouble to deal with the strife and economic hardship being dished out by the Bathroom Bullies. He thinks that if you have a man in the Women's Room, you should not be able to tell him to get the hell out. He says that if the man refuses to leave, you have no recourse to call the cops, because no rule would have broken.
Trump does not stop to consider why there are separate bathrooms. He does not think about why there is a rule that men can't be in the Womens Room. It is causing strife and economic hardship, and it is a gotcha question, so he'll just toss all that aside. It is Chesterton's Fence, and Trump did not take the time to understand what he was throwing away before throwing it away.
This is a penny-ante issue. But the way Trump deals with it is indicative of his general approach. He does not understand the principle behind Chesterton's Fence, because he does not have an understanding of conservatism.
Excerpted from The Thing - GK Chesterton - 1929
"In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away.” To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: “If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it."
Oh, that really makes sense.
Some these people are seriously-deluded.
Some of them are obviously drawing a paycheck.
Absolutely. You can see them here on this thread.
I hope for their sake they're demanding a higher rate these days; it's getting progressively harder to defend Cruz.
It’s so insane it can only be cash, I say, in the case of one in particular.
Nobody spams like that for free. I never believed CW did it for free. Putting yourself under that much stress with ridiculous posts and arguments. Unless something changed, last she posted was late March. That cannot be good for your health.
Hehe. I think some may be paid by wealthy Cruz supporters individually, or from PAC’s or SuperPac’.
I’ve said I would work for Trump, BUT if I were to post anything, it would a) have to have JimRob’s approval first and b) have to be disclosed with each thread started.
I bit my tongue for a long time on one (for a particular reason no one knows but myself and another FReeper) but finally had enough of him going after a couple folks, pretending he didn’t know better.
The collapse of social morals is the fault of the weakness of Christianity itself in the nation, which has lost the respect of the unbelievers because those who actually live as Christians are very few.
No President can change that.
“The only people talking about blue gloved TSA agents are Trump supporters.”
There you go again with yet another lie. I am not a Trump supporter. I used the blue gloved TSA agent scenario as a parody to highlight the ridiculous absurdity of what you are arguing must be enforced when taken to its logical and silly conclusion. What you are proposing must be done by Trump or any other candidate but Cruz is just as ridiculous and irrational as inviting registered sex offenders, male and female, into the gender segregated rest rooms. Just because you want to smear any opponent of Cruz, you are willing to go far beyond common decency and veer into irrational bigotry divorced from the realities of human biology.
“Somehow we had Mens and Ladies Rooms for hundreds of years without having any blue gloved TSA agents checking genitals.”
We also had these same Men’s and Women’s toilets being used during these same time periods by Human beings who did not conform to the genitalia requirements you are irrationally demanding as a qualification for entry and usage of those facilities. The problem here is with your going beyond the boundaries of common sense and safety to propose draconian and unenforceable legal actions that are contrary to Human biology and centuries of customary practices.
“Cruz thinks that the traditional approach was perfectly cromulent. 99.97% of the population knows where to go, and when you have a man in the Women’s Room, you tell him to get the hell out. If he absolutely refuses, you all the cops. It has been this way all along.”
That’s just your bigoted imagination, demonstrating further you are clueless and willfully ignorant when it comes to understanding the differences between what defines a man and a woman.
“Trump thinks the traditional approach should be tossed out because it is too much trouble to deal with the strife and economic hardship being dished out by the Bathroom Bullies. He thinks that if you have a man in the Women’s Room, you should not be able to tell him to get the hell out. He says that if the man refuses to leave, you have no recourse to call the cops, because no rule would have broken.”
Try trotting out the exact quotation where Trump actually said those very words.
“Trump does not stop to consider why there are separate bathrooms. He does not think about why there is a rule that men can’t be in the Womens Room. It is causing strife and economic hardship, and it is a gotcha question, so he’ll just toss all that aside. It is Chesterton’s Fence, and Trump did not take the time to understand what he was throwing away before throwing it away.”
Inventing such lies about what Trump or someone else has allegedly said is utterly destroying your credibility and helps to reinforce the public image of Ted Cruz actually being Lyin’ Ted Cruz. The more you engage in this kind of dishonest rhetoric, the more voters you drive away from Ted Cruz.
“This is a penny-ante issue. But the way Trump deals with it is indicative of his general approach. He does not understand the principle behind Chesterton’s Fence, because he does not have an understanding of conservatism.”
Based on your comments it appears you haven’t the least idea what does and does not constitute conservatism. You fail to acknowledge how you are arguing for a change that is as irrational, dramatic, and contrary to Human physiology as the change being demanded by the LGBT activists. That kind of demand for change is just as much the antithesis of conservatism as the LGBT demand for change.
Awwww, nanny-nanny-boo-boo Tedlim...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.