Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Elyse; tumblindice; Jane Long; MIA_eccl1212; SubMareener; E. Pluribus Unum; gubamyster; ...
I only see about five states where the candidates are "unbound"

Logic would tell me that if some are specifically unbound, then the others are "bound." THAT is how it is PRESENTED to those who voted in the primaries.

Please note the "Delegate allocation" column.

78 posted on 04/09/2016 9:42:35 PM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: gg188
I only see about five states where the DELEGATES are "unbound"

View this chart at Real Clear Politics

84 posted on 04/09/2016 9:44:58 PM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: gg188
Logic would tell me that if some are specifically unbound, then the others are "bound." THAT is how it is PRESENTED to those who voted in the primaries.

Please note the "Delegate allocation" column.

I vote in CA, and have never seen a delegate column. I saw that for the first time on the sample MD ballot that came out a few days ago. It seems it is not enough just to vote for the candidate--you also have to vote for the right delegates. I know there are only three candidates still officially running at this time--even so, not all of the candidates have delegates to vote for. This system of voting for a candidate AND delegates looks quite burdensome and prone to error to me.

192 posted on 04/10/2016 7:24:35 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson