[A Conservative Thinker]

Quite the opposite. You don’t want to face the very real scenario that South Carolina could be a bigger loss for Trump in South Carolina than Iowa but spare me the pollster predictions that were completely off in Iowa and didn’t get the results right in NH. I will agree to wait till a week from Saturday but I know for a fact the Cruz campaign has been working for a long time in South Carolina and the ground game is very impressive.

[RavenLooneyToon]

-Cruz campaign has been working for a long time in South Carolina and the ground game is very impressive.-

[Kazan]

You don’t want to face the very real scenario that South Carolina could be a bigger loss for Trump in South Carolina

What evidence is there that is realistic scenario?

Trump has led in SC since July. He had a 16-point lead before his win in NH.

SC is not Iowa. The military and national security are the top issues and Trump's message of building up the military and fixing the VA system is playing well there.

[Lakeshark]

You really don't get how hard it is to predict Iowa correctly and what the difference is when it's a caucus and a vote, do you? You really don't get why the polls were relatively accurate in New Hampshire, do you?

No. And no again. You clearly don't.

You also clearly can't read. I'm not saying things can't change, but you're a fool to start saying (like this author) that Cruz is the front runner or the favorite.

Sorry, that's the truth. Pretend all you want, that's simply the truth.