Media Reports A Second Wall Street Banking Loan “Inadvertently Omitted” By Candidate Ted Cruz…

Last Refuge/Conservative Treehousesundance ^ | January 15, 2016 | sundance

[Perdogg]

These are the freepers who come out every 4 years. Go figure.

[tallyhoe]

Really Do you get your info from Salon or Media matters!!!

[867V309]

Really Do you get your info from Salon or Media matters!!!

I get it from my Outlook inbox.

!!!

[montag813]

Would, as an example, a billionaire hedge-fund manager (Robert Mercer), who is in a legal fight with the IRS to the tune of $10 BILLION taxes owed, be willing to invest several million, perhaps tens of millions, into a presidential campaign in an effort to win the White House and influence a U.S. Tax Policy that would tilt the IRS scales in his favor – and consequently save him billions?

That's NEW YORK billionaire Robert Mercer -- who handed Ted Cruz's PAC a cool $11 million last year, the largest single contribution to any candidate's PAC by any contributor this cycle. Mercer also raised another $21 million for the PAC from other New York hedge fund managers.

Love those values!

[dragnet2]

Are you suggesting everything was completely disclosed according to FEC campaign finance laws?

According to multiple sources all over, that didn’t happen. And as to why all this was “inadvertently” omitted or missed is subject for obvious concern.

[free_life]

Head shaking .... reckless .... we will see in next few weeks how he weathers this/these.

[montag813]

This is not good. Too much bad stuff coming out about Cruz all of a sudden, and most of it is self-inflicted, regardless of the motives of those exposing this information.

And in EVERY case, instead of getting out ahead of it, months in advance, Cruz seems to prefer to deceive and hope he gets away with it. Just imagine him on a constant defense from Democrat Super PAC attacks as GOP nominee.

[Behind the Blue Wall]

No I wouldn’t say that. What particularly about my comment would you say mischaracterized Senator Cruz?

[dragnet2]

I hope I'm wrong, but I think the loans issue is serious. Cruz is smart enough to know loans from the very Wall Street banks he attacked during his senate campaign would hurt him if they became known to the general public. It’s just a bit too coincidental that there were TWO loans, and he just happened to forget them both. Sorry, I'm not buying it.

There is good reason for concern. And was he being bankrolled by their competition for future influence. My hunch is that is a damn good possibility.

[montag813]

For those that didn’t read it...this happened during his Texas Senatorial campaign. It’s not a Federal issue. Texas will more that likely address this.

Federal office. Federal salary.

[tallyhoe]

yes!!

[tallyhoe]

So you get a blog sent to you inbox that can publish anything they want and it don’t have to be the truth!!!

[dragnet2]

So there is nothing to see here? No attempts to subvert campaign finance laws, fail to disclose, no possibility for outside entities buying influence etc. If that’s your position, that’s fine. But how would you know this?

[867V309]

So you get a blog sent to you inbox that can publish anything they want and it don’t have to be the truth!!!

I have noticed that some pre-2000 sign-ups here seem to suffer some sort of dementia.

[tallyhoe]

I have noticed that some pre-2000 sign-ups here seem to suffer some sort of dementia.

I consider you a newbee!!!

[dragnet2]

Did you happen to read this? It’s quite interesting.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/01/15/media-reports-a-second-wall-street-banking-loan-inadvertently-omitted-by-candidate-ted-cruz/

[867V309]

I consider you a newbee!!!

Thanks.

!!!

[Noob1999]

Yeah, we certainly don’t want to hear about a loan to a pubbie.
Much better to have Tony Resco buy your house for you, then on day one sign an EO to keep all your dealings secret!

[John Valentine]

Because Ted Cruz is a candidate for federal office, you can say almost anything without any risk of being sued for slander or libel. But this sort of crap ought to be actionable regardless “ ...bought and paid for by the Goldman Sachs/Citicorp globalists...”

In the old days, you’d be horsewhipped and shot.

[patq]

“ ...bought and paid for by the Goldman Sachs/Citicorp globalists...”

Good point about Cruz, John V. It gives me pause.