Skip to comments.
Dem Gun Ban Would Require Confiscation, Ban Most Pistols
Media Trackers ^
| November 6, 2015
| Brian Sikma
Posted on 11/07/2015 10:08:01 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have extras of many guns.
If the time ever comes, I will pass them out like candy.
41
posted on
11/07/2015 2:17:45 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But Konopacki was not the first to spot the troublesome lack of a grandfather clause. Yes, of course: the lack of a grandfather clause is the "troublesome" part of this law.
If only there was a grandfather clause included, then this outright gun-ban would be a fine piece of legislation...
42
posted on
11/07/2015 2:25:43 PM PST
by
sargon
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar; osagebowman; Ramius; g'nad
***they are “designed to kill large numbers of people quickly.†***Why doesn't somebody design a hammer to "hit large numbers of nails quickly"? The entire world would benefit, and make the inventor richer than Soros.
43
posted on
11/07/2015 2:42:34 PM PST
by
300winmag
(Whatever CAN go wrong has already happened. We just don't know about it yet.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The term “semiautomatic assault rifle” is not redundant; it’s self-contradictory.
44
posted on
11/07/2015 2:50:22 PM PST
by
Bob
(No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not accomplishments; they're jobs.)
To: Pollster1
“When it’s time to bury your weapons, it’s time to dig them up . . . and use them.”
And the same for lost firearms in boating accidents!
45
posted on
11/07/2015 4:36:53 PM PST
by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: 2001convSVT
And the same for lost firearms in boating accidents! It's a good thing conservatives tend to be multi-talented. I imagine most of us have the scuba skills to recover our losses when the time comes.
46
posted on
11/07/2015 4:39:51 PM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Pollster1
47
posted on
11/07/2015 4:43:43 PM PST
by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: BobL
The Dem retort to our opposition is saying something like “no one has taken your guns away, you're paranoidâ€.See my post 11 for responding to the "paranoid" meme.
48
posted on
11/07/2015 5:16:04 PM PST
by
Oatka
(ES)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
When you go to sleep a free man and wake up as a criminal without doing anything...
That’s the definition of tyranny.
49
posted on
11/07/2015 6:28:05 PM PST
by
DaBeerfreak
(As long as the politicians believe they're not the problem; we have a big problem.)
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But Konopacki wasn't the first to spot the troublesome lack of a grandfather clause. Lack of a "grandfather" clause is not what's troublesome.
What's troublesome is the fact that the author of the bill has not been expelled from the legislature, tarred and feathered, and ostracized from civil society.
51
posted on
11/08/2015 5:52:32 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Following a few links, it would appear that Miss Subek is a former state leader of NARAL.
Planned Barrenhood kills roughly 1000 children every day.
Why doesn’t she propose banning them?
52
posted on
11/08/2015 6:07:54 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson