Posted on 10/08/2015 6:07:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
When Ted Cruz announced his campaign for president, I said he didnt have a chance. The Texas senator isnt just extremean ideological outlier with hard-right positions on virtually everything under the sunbut hes unpopular with other Republican lawmakers. He stepped on the stage as a critic of national GOP leadership and has used his influence with grassroots conservatives to force confrontations like the 2013 government shutdown. Cruz has burned his bridges with powerful party figures like Majority Leader Mitch McConnellon one occasion, Cruz called McConnell a liar on the Senate floorand is toxic to many of his Senate Republican colleagues.
This isnt new. Cruz has always been antagonistic toward his party. Its why I was an immediate skeptic of his campaign. When choosing a nominee for president, political parties want consensus. They nominate people who satisfy all the partys interests and constituencies. They dont nominate gadflies like Cruz.
Cruz is still an unlikely choice for nominee. But I was wrong to discount him. Not because he can win, but becausealone among the insurgent Republican candidates for presidenthe might survive Iowa and New Hampshire to face the establishment, one on one (or one on two). Heres why.
First, the polls. Every national Republican primary poll has three tiers. At the bottom are niche and vanity candidates who barely make a blip, like Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and former New York Gov. George Pataki. At the top, right now, are outsider candidates like Donald Trump, Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina, who will fade as we get closer to actual voting. And in the middle, there are the most viable candidates, who will rise as others shrink away or drop out. That final tier now holds three candidates who touch or approach double-digit support: Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Ted Cruz....
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
We’re supposed to listen to Slate, about what to expect in the GOP elections?
I don’t expect them to know what in the world, they are talking about.
Just saying.
Salon and now Slate? Wow! Ted’s stock is definitely rising. Go Ted!
Slate: “Ted Cruz Is the Bizarro Romney”
Salon: “Ted Cruz, evil genius”
So which is it? The left needs to do a better job of coordinating its message.
Actually, most of what is written in this article (except for the obvious lib digs at Cruz) is merely a compilation of other articles - not much original here, just the lib slant.
LMAO... Imagine the horror of discovering he was WRONG the 1st time!...Now he doubledowns on being WRONG again!!!!.....These guy actually get paid for their stupidity....Amazing!!!!
Why doesn’t Slate concentrate on the Democrat front runners: an old lying crook and an old idiot Socialist?
#TerrifiedOfTed
lol
Yep! The media are in full attack mode.
Jamelle Bouie
sounds Orthadox Jew
Like Sammy Davis?
The author describes Cruz as extreme which I suppose he is. His commitment to his conservative principles as well as to common sense are extreme, and extremely rare. The last point is an indictment of our society, not of Cruz.
I watched the video, is that Rachel Maddow as a transsexual?
The guy looks just like her and thinks icentical.
Come tell me it’s not her.
LOL Maybe Chris Hayes is Maddow’s sister.
I’ve been in Cruz’s corner for a long time.
I think he’s the closest to Ronald Reagan that we have seen.
Mitch McConnell is a liar, what else is new?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.