Skip to comments.
Sanders: We need 'sensible' gun-control bill
The Hill's Floor Action Blog ^
| October 1, 2015
| Jordain Carney
Posted on 10/02/2015 10:20:25 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
I'm guessing that Oregon already has strict gun control laws.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ah... here it comes.. that word, “sensible.”
What is “sensible” to a Soviet Union-worshipping socialist is quite something else for the public at large.
2
posted on
10/02/2015 10:22:22 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(If you're not enraged...why?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A socialist pushing for gun control. What a surprise.
3
posted on
10/02/2015 10:22:26 AM PDT
by
mykroar
("Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." - Otto von Bismarck)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Sensible" Gun Control Legislation to an avowed Socialist like Bernie Sanders = seizing everyone's guns.
Come and try taking mine, Bernie.
4
posted on
10/02/2015 10:22:28 AM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
My idea of sensible is that you have the concealed carry people that don’t miss when they pull out their gun to defend the innocent.
Their idea is to disarm the vigilant citizen.
5
posted on
10/02/2015 10:22:47 AM PDT
by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
6
posted on
10/02/2015 10:23:57 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Lets try ‘gun-free’ zones. That ought to work.....
While we are are it, lets look to cities like Chicago and Washington DC as examples. Afterall, the politicians there said that their laws were ‘reasonable’.....(eyes rolling)
7
posted on
10/02/2015 10:24:10 AM PDT
by
TMA62
(Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sanders has had only one positive attribute: A relatively pro-gun record.
Looks like he's doing all he can to get rid of that.
8
posted on
10/02/2015 10:24:20 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: ScottinVA
Isn’t it nice how the media never calls them on it and makes them explain specifically what these ‘sensible’ gun laws would be?
9
posted on
10/02/2015 10:25:30 AM PDT
by
VOR78
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“sensible gun-control legislation” SHOULD BE:
Deport (at least) criminal illegals
Ban “gun free zones”
Nationwide CCW law
10
posted on
10/02/2015 10:25:31 AM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does this sensible land have unicorns and flying pigs too? Good luck preventing criminals from getting guns.
11
posted on
10/02/2015 10:25:40 AM PDT
by
NohSpinZone
(First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I agree in sensible gun control laws. First get rid of “gun free zones”. Second, require every capable citizen to own a gun.
12
posted on
10/02/2015 10:25:40 AM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
OK, let’s have one sensible new gun law - legalize concealed carry in all 50 states so that people can protect themselves from these inevitable attacks by mentally ill people.
13
posted on
10/02/2015 10:26:14 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: mykroar
No Bernie what we need are guns not ending up in the hands of leftists trying to assist the current regime’s anti-gun stance.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
LOL, I actually saw an article on Slate non-sarcastically calling Bernie Sanders a right-wing gun nut.
15
posted on
10/02/2015 10:27:00 AM PDT
by
Objective Scrutator
(All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"We need a comprehensive approach. We need sensible gun-control legislation which prevents guns from being used by people who should not have them," Notice that it says "being used" not "owned" or "bought".
So how does "legislation" control a criminal's actions? We have a law right now that says "no murdering". That is "legislation" that should prevent the "use" of guns by people who should not have them.
Maybe he's just stupid.
16
posted on
10/02/2015 10:27:08 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What we need are no gun free zones. And nationwide concealed and open carry. The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy or gal with a gun. An armed society is a more polite society.
17
posted on
10/02/2015 10:27:28 AM PDT
by
Tudorfly
(All things are possible within the will of God.)
To: Lazamataz
He’s competing with Hillary, he has to.
18
posted on
10/02/2015 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Need stop and frisk in all us cities.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How long has this impotent little man been in the Senate? If he’s so qualified to lead, then just what is his reason that we don’t already have this sensible law already on the books?
Isn’t his calling for ANY new legislation really a confession of his ineffectiveness all these years?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
