Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Comments?
1 posted on 09/29/2015 10:48:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

This writer is in Texas? Sounds like someone has been inhaling a whoft of cannabis. Did the author write this in Seattle or Denver?


2 posted on 09/29/2015 10:54:06 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Add the cumulative support of Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Rubio and Cruz, and you’ve got — what did I say? — just about one third of Americans”

Wrong. Those five together account for over 70% of Republican primary voters, in other words two-thirders in the parlance of establishment liberal John Young.


4 posted on 09/29/2015 10:56:38 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Did you hear about the poll showing that one-third of Louisiana Republicans blamed Obama for the poor federal response to Hurricane Katrina...

I would call him a liar. I would say most of them blame Governor Blanco, and they would be right...

Did you hear that three years into implementation, a sizable portion of Republicans still believes “death panels” are built into the Affordable Care Act?

It is. It is written into every line. Surprising this genius still hasn't figured it out.

Did you hear that Obama will abolish the 22nd Amendment to make himself president for life?

Yes, I have heard it repeatedly from O's own supporters and inner circle. Mainly during the first term of office. Haven't heard it lately, I think even they are getting tired of him...

He calls Carson’s assertion that a Muslim should not be president not only contrary to the First Amendment but “morally outrageous.”

Really? Its not contrary to the First Amendment to vote against someone who shouldn't be president.

Its not morally outrageous to vote against someone incapable of obeying the constitution. I wish people had thought about this before electing a marxist.

5 posted on 09/29/2015 10:57:33 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Given that this “President”, with a complicit ultraleft media, has done everything to hide/cover up/lie about his past, it is no wonder that the worst can be believed about him.

You built THAT, Zero. Own it.


6 posted on 09/29/2015 10:58:19 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The other 2/3 wouldn’t mind if a democrat won.

Remember how many people voted for Carter in 1980+all the George HW Bush snobs that were scared of Reagan.

Reagan saved/re-launched a confident America; Bush capitulated to Sen. Dem leader George Mitchell-who basically ran US domestic policy. imo


8 posted on 09/29/2015 11:00:35 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Its Austin.Just a commie sh!thole.


9 posted on 09/29/2015 11:01:47 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Facts:

1) Except in the very odd/exceptional election year of 1964, the Dems haven’t cracked 50% of the whites in a Presidential election since 1932.

2) Once the ‘64 election was over, the Dems understood that they would never win another Presidential election again unless the Republicans REALLY screwed up...or unless they changed the electorate in a dramatic way.

3) The Dems, courtesy of Bobby Kennedy who wrote the law, and Teddy Kennedy who pushed it in the Senate, passed the 1965 Immigration Act. That law dramatically reduced immigration from our then-traditional large sources of immigrants - England, Ireland, Holland, Germany, etc. - and replaced them with vast numbers of Turd Worlders...whom everyone knows vote around 80% for Dems, and will continue to do so for the rest of their lives, as new immigrants have traditionally done.

4) As a result of the ‘65 Act, and due to the Dem’s outright lying in ‘86 regarding an effective (or any) fence, there are now probably 30 - 40 million illegals in this nation. Note that the (probably low-ball) figure in 2005 was 11 million...we have 2-3 million come in every year, so simple math says that the number is actually somewhere between 31 and 41 million). If any substantial portion of these people ever become citizens, then the Dems will have accomplished a complete shift of the electorate, and will be virtually invincible on the national level. Every state will become like California, both politically and economically - which is to say, overwhelming Dem and broke. But at least if you don’t like California now, you can leave for a better place without much trouble - where are you going to go if EVERY state is like that?

5) Every Republican, and every Conservative voter MUST UNDERSTAND that if such a state of affairs comes to be, NO OTHER ISSUE WILL MATTER AT ALL, because we will ALWAYS AND FOREVER lose on those issues. Immigration is THE issue of this election, and this election is as critical as the 1860 election was - and for the same reason, because it will determine whether this nation continues on as it has existed in the past, or becomes a new and unrecognizable entity that simply occupies the same geographic territory.

Please wake up, and help others to do so by sending them this post (or recommending “Adios America” to them). It really is THAT important.


10 posted on 09/29/2015 11:01:56 PM PDT by Ultima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s the ranting of a frightened GOPe stooge.


11 posted on 09/29/2015 11:02:29 PM PDT by Pelham (It ain't over 'til it's over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Speaking as someone who used to write ad copy for a living, I have some observations on the term “Thirders”.
1. Taken from an audio perspective, the term “Thirders” is not appealing. It sounds minor, vs major. There is no sharp vowel sound (a,e,i,o,u,y).
2. The definition of ‘third’ brings to mind something ‘not as good as the ‘first’, almost as good as the ‘second’.
3. Forgive me for saying it, but that word sounds awfully close to the word ‘turders’: something no one wishes to identify with.
I’m not talking about the meaning. I understand his meaning, and more or less agree with his conclusions. I’m speaking only of the sound effect of that term.
In my opinion, I’m fine being called a member of the Tea Party.


12 posted on 09/29/2015 11:05:09 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just the fact that he used the term, “right wingers”, shows his true colors... Of course, him posting from Texas’ Communist Austin says a lot.


13 posted on 09/29/2015 11:05:44 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
... spectacularly resistant to anything approaching reality ...

I know you are but what am I. And thanks for calling me young.

14 posted on 09/29/2015 11:07:41 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The thirders want to kick the conservatives out of the GOP?


16 posted on 09/29/2015 11:19:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What an unbiased take from this "Journalist":

Young has won several national awards including two first-place honors from the National Society of Newspaper Columnists, first place in commentary from the Education Writers Association and multiple Best of Cox honors in in column writing and editorial writing. He is a two-time winner of the national Maggie Award from Planned Parenthood of America for commentaries about family planning, reproductive rights and gay rights. He also was a third-place winner in the National Headliners Awards for editorial writing.

From here:

http://www.johnyoungcolumn.com/bio.html

17 posted on 09/29/2015 11:26:12 PM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“... that Republicans and those who lean that way are about 45 percent of voters — and if Trump and Carson are supported by roughly 20 percent of them apiece (new CNN poll) — that means that they are supported by 9 percent apiece of all of us. If 11 percent of Republicans fall for Carly Fiorina’s increasingly fact-challenged claims, that’s about 5 percent of us. If Cruz is supported by 5 percent of Republicans, that represents 2.25 percent of us.”

Reminds me of Abbott and Costello doing math:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxjVW8iLMdU


18 posted on 09/29/2015 11:26:13 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dear John Young,
I was in West Africa prior to the first election of Obama and during his election. It was widely accepted there that Obama was born in Kenya and a muslim. Muslim money traders had pictures of their man in his full muslim regalia posted in their kiosks. Their opinion, openly stated with no debate? Their man, a muslim from Kenya was going to RU*LE America.

You really have no idea but have been swayed by the medias.


19 posted on 09/29/2015 11:32:01 PM PDT by himno hero (hadnuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This writer stuffs straw men and tosses the out there to make us feel shame. That is a fraudulent tactic, well used by Obama and Debbie Schultz. That disqualifies the writer from any serious consideration.


21 posted on 09/30/2015 12:24:28 AM PDT by Richard Axtell (The March to the Abyss is speeding up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thanks fully, I’m not a 2/3’der.


25 posted on 09/30/2015 2:15:44 AM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Snarky liberal from Austin. Cold Anger will be sending him back to his room.


26 posted on 09/30/2015 2:33:41 AM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Thirder”

There are some people who cannot feel comfortable about the world unless they have categorized everything and everyone into nice neat partitions. They are compelled by their psychosis to allocate individuals into groups to which they can apply a nice neat label. In this case the term ‘Birther’ is the label they applied to individuals who blasphemed their Obama deity. The new term is ‘Thirder’. This is the label they apply to anyone who tries to interfere with the agenda of the RepubliCrat alliance. This is the alliance, as articulately spotlighted by Ted Cruz, that animates over the cliff the movement of American culture, borders and language (hat tip to the savage).

This helps them to dehumanize the objects of their categorizations. Having already identified these groups as ‘enemies’ they’ve been conditioned to ‘punish’, there will not be a lot of pity or remorse when they unleash the forces of government against a ‘Thirder’ or a ‘Birther’.


27 posted on 09/30/2015 2:37:43 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (War is cruelty, there is no use trying to reform it; the crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Those dang Thirders ... Are they back AGAIN? lol

America’s 2nd Revolution!


28 posted on 09/30/2015 2:42:20 AM PDT by IwaCornDogs ("There Will Be Bamboozeling" ~ Nobama 08')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson