Of course not! I just expect both side to be stated without pushing links as one of the sides. Both sides of the argument should have been stated in the heading without causing to much “outsourcing” with or without links.
Nothing else was inferred!
Path to victory: http://www.fitsnews.com/2015/01/20/ted-cruz-win-south-carolinas-presidential-primary/
...a lot to like: http://www.fitsnews.com/2015/03/10/ted-cruz-speaking-truth-to-power-in-iowa/
...things to dislike: http://www.fitsnews.com/2015/06/29/ted-cruzs-hypocritical-war-for-government-defined-marriage/
Is that satisfactory?