Posted on 04/24/2015 1:41:02 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
How insulting and cruel is the NYT ... to homosexuals.
You don't see ANY moral difference between meeting with potential supporters who happen to be homosexual (which does not imply any approval of their lifestyle) and attending a same-sex marriage (which carries an implied approval of the ceremony as well as their lifestyle)?
Amazing that your common sense is so lacking...
My widowed friend recently remarried and her husbands oldest son is gay. My friends oldest daughter is also gay. They certainly are not going to stop loving them because of that, although they make it very clear to them that they do not condone it.
Libs are so used to painting moral objection as hate that they can’t distinguish the two.
“Moral Difference?” What part of abominations to the Lord and God don’t you get? These queers commit abominations just like the lesbians at the reception do. You are not that smart. More of a smart alec.
There is a HUGE moral difference between doing business with someone that may be involved in a sin that is unrelated to your business with them and participating in a ceremony intended to celebrate that sin. If you don't understand that difference, you are more dense than you first appear.
Even Jesus spent time with sinners. Merely being with a sinner does not imply approval or acceptance of their sin. If it is your intention to never be around anyone who sins, or do business with sinners, then you need to move out to the woods and live off the land as a hermit - otherwise, you are going to have to work with and be around people who are involved in things you find morally reprehensible. As long as you are not a partaker in their sin, nor approving of their sin, then you are not morally culpable for their actions.
Anyway you try to justify Cruz taking money from gays -you are wrong. There will more then likely be some high price down the road to pay for the donation. Any smart politician on the right would have bypassed these two plus the lesbian wedding reception. Now trying to justify which one is better then the other is like saying this sin is not as bad as that one. Some will say anything for MONEY.
So are you saying that for a politician to accept a campaign donation from a homosexual is a sin? Or that by accepting a donation, that makes him complicit in the sin of the person giving the donation? That is asinine.
Yes, Ted Cruz will be the president of all people, and that includes gays, lesbians, trans genders, cross dressers, feminists, abortionists, dope addicts, prostitutes, illegals, and all other abnormal people. Because we have all those inhabiting the country. The president must love them all. He does not have to like them. But he must protect every one. The constitution does not specify any exceptions except traitors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.