One has to perform intellectual somersaults in order to assert otherwise.
The courts will affirm the fact that Cruz is an NBC. It's a trivial legal exercise. There will be no doubt, despite any wishful thinking on the deniers' parts.
“Ted Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen.”
Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada on 22 December 1970, according to the Canadian birth certificate presented to the news media by U.S. Senator Cruz and other sources. He acquired Canadian native born citizenship at birth in accordance with Jus soli (the law of the soil) common-law customs and unnatural Canadian statutory law, so he was born as a Canadian citizen. He also acquired the right to claim Cuban citizenship by the legal principle of Jus sanguinis (the law of the bloodline) granted through statute retroactively at birth due to his father’s Cuban citizenship, which is unnatural law, upon reaching his age of majority. He also MAY OR MAY NOT have been lawfully or unlawfully granted the right for his parents to claim U.S. citizenship for him by the legal principle of Jus sanguinis (the law of the bloodline) granted through unnatural statute retroactively at birth due to his mother’s U.S. Cuban citizenship.
The fact that Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was born in a foreign nation, under foreign jurisdiction, and a Canadian citizen at birth by authority of unnatural statutory laws automatically and by definition disqualifies any possibility of his being a natural born citizen of the United States or any other sovereign nation through no fault whatsoever of his own. No person ever can be born a natural born citizen of any nation when the citizenship is acquired by a grant of citizenship through the authority of unnatural statutory law. Unnatural statutory law and natural law are contradictory and opposite terms. A natural born citizen acquires citizenship only through the authority of natural law, because the Nature of the birth allows only one possible citizenship and only one possible allegiance to only one possible sovereign in only one possible jurisdiction.
“He was an American citizen at birth due to the age and citizenship of his mother.”
Was Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz “an American citizen at birth”, or are we unable to presently exclude the possibility his parents’ claim to a statutory grant of U.S. citizenship retroactively at birth in Canada was a fraudulent claim? Let’s look at the currently available evidence for and against the claim of U.S. citizenship.
First, Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was not born in and under the jurisdiction of the United States and did not acquire U.S. citizenship by the authority of “Jus soli (the law of the soil) - a rule of common law under which the place of a person’s birth determines citizenship.”
Second, Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz did not acquire U.S. citizenship by the authority of Jus sanguinis (the law of the bloodline) - a concept of Roman or civil law under which a person’s citizenship is determined by the father’s citizenship; because his father, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, was not a U.S. citizen or a U.S. national. Rafael Bienvenido Cruz was born in Matanzas, Cuba in 1939, and he was a Cuban citizen from his birth until his naturalization as a U.S. citizen in 2005, thirty-five years after the birth of the child.
Third, Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz may or may not have “lawfully” acquired U.S. citizenship by the authority of Jus sanguinis (the law of the bloodline) under which a person’s citizenship is determined by the mother’s U.S. citizenship; because we cannot presently exclude the possibility his mother, Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh Wilson, was not lawfully married at the time of birth. Reports have in indicated Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was previously married to Julia Anne Garza, and those same news media allegedly searched for and were unable to find a divorce record for that married couple. Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh Wilson is also reported to have been married previously with children. The news media have alleged a search for her divorce record also could not be found in the period of time prior to the birth of Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz. In the event that one or both parents had failed and/or been unable to obtain a divorce from their spouse/s before the birth of Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz, it would then be possible his U.S. citizen mother was unwed at the time of his birth, which in turn would reduce the amount of time the mother was allowed by law to remain not in residence in the United States before the birth of her son, Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz, from five years to only one year. In the event she was unwed and not resident in the United States for more than one calendar year, then the papers she and the father filed with the U.S. Consulate in Canada to claim U.S. citizenship would have been fraudulent and thereby the grant of U.S. citizenship would remain subject to revocation to this day.
Until and unless the necessary divorce, marriage, and immigration records are disclosed to exclude the possibility of illegitimacy, it will remain impossible for anyone in the general public to affirmatively determine by documentary records whether or not the U.S. citizenship granted to Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was lawful or an unlawful and fraudulent claim of U.S. citizenship by the parents.
Even if we could safely assume Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was lawfully entitled by the unnatural statutory law for U.S. immigration and naturalization to receive a grant of U.S. citizenship for birth while abroad from the jurisdiction of the United States, that would only make him a U.S. citizen and not a natural born citizen. Being a U.S. citizen and/or a native born U.S. citizen by authority of an unnatural statutory grant of citizenship is the opposite of and not synonymous with being a natural born citizen.
“One has to perform intellectual somersaults in order to assert otherwise.”
“Intellectual somersaults” is precisely what you are doing when you ignore the big obstacle in the room in the form of a natural born citizen being so simply because no statutory law was required to establish the acquisition of citizenship; whereas an unnatural born citizen requires a manmade, artificial, and therefore unnatural statutory law to acquire and to retain citizenship. The issue is as simple as it gets: citizenship acquired by the authority of statutory law is unnatural law and unnatural citizenship and/or unnatural born citizenship; whereas natural born citizenship is acquired by the natural law which is the opposite of and exclusionary of unnatural statutory law.
“The courts will affirm the fact that Cruz is an NBC. It’s a trivial legal exercise. There will be no doubt, despite any wishful thinking on the deniers’ parts.”
It is not as if the Federal judicial branch of the U.S. Government has not repeatedly committed gross violations of the U.S. Constitution on an annual basis. All one needs to do is look at how these Federal Courts have corrupted the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens along with numerous other parts of the Constitution and its Amendments. It is always “a trivial legal exercise” when the judiciary commits gross violations of the law, especially in a totalitarian dictatorship as exemplified in the Russian Federation, the Soviet Union, and the NAZI courts of Germany’s Third Reich to name just a few. In all such cases what is true, right, and valid remains in the right whether or not a corrupt government and a corrupt citizenry are willing to acknowledge it so.