Posted on 04/07/2015 10:14:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
If he gets the nomination, I will vote for him with no qualms.
Rand Paul pals around with traitors.
RP and Adam kokesh.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE9gVeykPAU
If he gets the Nom I’m leaving the party for good.
He just lost me right there.
Maybe he meant 11 million in California.
HUH , the man is plain nuts, yesterday he said this.
“Any law> that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed”
He is pandering to illegals, homosexuals, and blacks while calling the base neo cons and not standing u for conservative principles.
If you cannot see how nuts the man is and how much pandering he has done then I hope you do soon .
Saw him interviewed and nearly fell off my chair, the man is pandering so bad is smells of desperation and I can only conclude after that interview and what he said in his speech like this.
“Any law> that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed”
That he is either a lunatic or he is out to destroy the republican party from within , more so than the other RINO’s
Paul is a neocon like daddy....
Neocons are Lindseed Grahamnesty and Juan McStain. So lets don’t diss Rand Paul for calling a spade a spade. I don’t agree with him on everything but he’s right about the Neocons. We can thank them and Obutt for the Arab Spring.
I can’t wait to see Ted Cruz take this nappy-headed jerk apart in the debates.
McCain had a conservative challenger in the primary. Most, if not all, of us supported him. Sarah came in and endorsed the Establishment candidate against the conservative challenger. She gets a pass.
Yet when Rand Paul endorses his Senate colleague (who was the Establishment candidate facing a conservative challenger), it proves he's unprincipled and not acceptable. Do you not see the double standard?
His endorsement of Ditch was discouraging, but not fatal. He has stood up for many of our causes in the Senate. Look at the whole record.
Keep in mind..the old white men base, which has been the largest support group for GOP in the past is dwindling in comparison to Latino’s, Blacks, immigrants from non-European countries (one million+ EACH and EVERY year, and most are from Asia and Africa), the openly homo-sexual’s, and of course the illegal immigrants.
There are 6 million plus Americans over 115 years old, actively contributing to social security! Those are obviously illegals using stolen numbers from people who have died. They can all vote! In WA state where I live, you can register without any proof of citizenship. At the post office, at the DOL, at schools, at colleges etc. And 100% of voting is by mail. No one ever sees your face to vote. No ID of any kind required to vote.
Yeah, I know reality is a byotch. But ignore reality at your own peril.
The first thing senator Cruz said about senator Paul yesterday was all positive. He actually praised him!
His challenger was flaky and wasn’t going to win, and the 2008 republican ticket turning on itself would have dominated the news and the entire tone of the 2010 election, and it would have destroyed what turned out to be an historical victory for conservatives and republican. You cannot confuse such huge, national strategic events, with Paul’s simple establishment pandering and support.
Paul is just a pandering rino/libertarian, who could have helped the tea party, but instead turned his back on it in Mississippi, and with McConnell and who was entirely too enthusiastic about Romney.
“Rand Paul to steer clear of Mississippi runoff”
“Rand Paul: It’s a ‘misnomer’ to say McConnell isn’t conservative”
“Rand Paul To Campaign for Romney”
March, 2013—”Rand Paul endorses Mitch McConnell in 2014 Senate race, won’t back tea party challenge”
The problem with Paul is that he is NOT out there convincing people to become conservatives, instead he is out there seeking liberals to help him defeat conservatism within the GOP.
That is a big difference.
By the way, why you do you talk like a lefty?
The “old white men base”?
You mean white Americans of all ages and both sexes, the original Americans who still vote against the left?
Paul and Obama are completely wrong to want to shrink the military, we are struggling as it is, and are facing a resurgent Russia in Europe, invading territory and threatening NATO and a China building to become a global threat, that is putting the Pacific under threat right now.
Cruz understands that the day the man announces is perhaps not the time to attack. But if you think Ted will ignore Paul's stances on amnesty, queer marriage, and his pandering to black criminals, you're in for a shock.
“Old white men” is used in a derogatory sense by leftists, and now by you.
Let’s pander to everyone else, including the queers! /S
And please, for the love of Pete, learn how to use apostrophes.
“Paul and Obama are completely wrong to want to shrink the military”
Correct me if I’m wrong but as far as I know this thread is about Rand Paul’s appearance on Hannity last night. Last night Rand Paul unequivocally stated that he wants to significantly increase the military however he plans to pay for it by cutting spending elsewhere instead of borrowing it. I am in agreement with that plan. At no time did Rand Paul tell Sean Hannity he wanted to shrink the military.
Its OK if you are not a Rand Paul fan but try to be accurate about what was said. Just because I’m backing Ted Cruz does not mean I’m going to try to twist what another candidate says. I’m not a big Walker fan but I will take whatever he says as that’s what he said when he comes on Sean Hannity for his hour. Same deal with Rubio and anybody else.
He had been a member of the House and put up a pretty good voting record. We'd be better off with him in the Senate than with Gutless Juan McVain, the Amnesty Whore.
Which has nothing to do with our exchange.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.