There were many lawsuits that were not decided on the basis of lack of standing. The most well-known were the trials on the merits in New Jersey and in Georgia.
Standing was indeed an obstacle, primarily in the 2008 election cycle because the people who had standing under Article III of the Constitution, most notably John McCain and then in 2012, Mitt Romney decided not to file suit; not to enter an existing legal challenge as a co-plaintiff; or even to submit an amicus brief in support of any legal challenge.
Also, there are no issues of standing to get in the way of a CRIMINAL investigation for forgery, identity theft, fraud, document tampering or election fraud and yet there has never been a formal criminal investigation in any jurisdiction.
The New Jersey trial (which can be watched on YouTube): https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l49PTOtnQvg was Purpura and Moran v Obama; and the Georgia trial on the merits (which excerpts from can be seen on YouTube:) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yg1r8tWOT3c was Farrar, Powell, Swensson & Welden v Obama.
Altogether there have been 220 original jurisdiction lawsuits, 97 state and federal appellate court rulings and 26 applications and petitions at the Supreme Court of the United States. That’s 343 attempts and zero successes.
With seven and nine judge state and federal Supreme Courts, three judge state and federal appellate court panels and 220 trial courts, close to a thousand judges have looked at Obama’s eligibility without a single judge finding him to be ineligible.
It boggles the mind how so many judges just could not acknowledge the supremely gifted legal mind of Orly Taitz, Esq., doesn’t it?
;)
It does not matter how many pro-President Obama citations you provide for us. In the small amount of cases in which the court reached the merits of the definition of natural born citizen, each judge simply relied upon the previous judge who relied upon the Fourteenth Amendment and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), neither of which define a natural born citizen any differently than does Minor v. Happersett (1875), i.e., a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth. In other words, reliance upon the Fourteenth Amendment and Wong Kim Ark to hold that Obama is an Article II natural born citizen is misplaced. Also, the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to give us a decision on whether Obama is a natural born citizen.