[ansel12]

Let’s just say that you have spent a exorbitant amount of time attacking a spent politician who is not running.
I don’t think he is relevant to this upcoming election and I don’t like the idea of continuing to smear him.

Bingo, conservatives are attacking him in your eyes, and you don't like your man, the King of rinos, and the man who gave us Obama in 2012, and arguably in 2008, and who is currently hurting conservatism and is going to take it into 2016, being "smeared".

LOL, what a romneybot salesman.

You don't challenge anyone, you haven't challenged any of my facts about Mitt Romney.

You guys are as dishonest as your man himself.

[Cold Heat]

“You don’t challenge anyone, you haven’t challenged any of my facts about Mitt Romney.”

Why the hell should I?

**It would not lead to anything positive or even relevant.

**You would not accept it in any case.

**Those of us who voted for him, tried all that years ago and it led to a purge at FR..

As I said, it’s not relevant and it does not matter. but I will say that given the same circumstances and the same choices, I would do it all over again. As would you, so what’s the point?