Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: delapaz

I would prefer Perry myself. But lets face it, he’s not going anywhere. Santorum would be my second choice but...ditto.

Gingrich would be my third choice and he appears to be collapsing.

Neither Ron Paul nor Mitt Romney have been on my list. Ever.

But given that “choice” I’d probably have to vote for Paul and hope he had enough intelligence to pick a foreign policy hawk as VP because as acceptable as Paul might be on fiscal issues, his foreign policy could get a lot of innocent American civilians murdered.


26 posted on 12/19/2011 9:03:15 AM PST by Grunthor (Unrepentant breeder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Grunthor
I’d probably have to vote for Paul...

I'll just stay home, then. Paul is a 9/11 "Truther." The chance he'll have a hawkish foriegn policy is nil.

44 posted on 12/19/2011 9:37:13 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Grunthor
I beg to differ. Perry is going up in the polls. Perry is going up big time and it's a steady climb.

Forget national polls, their meaningless right now.

If Newt gets hammered in Iowa and loses New Hampshire he's done.

If Perry finishes in the top 3 in Iowa he can skip NH and focus on SC.

If Bachmann and Santorum drop out that means Perry and Mitt will fight it out.

I believe if Bachmann leaves the race after Iowa she will endorse Mitt. My hope is if Santorum leaves he will back Perry.

90 posted on 12/19/2011 10:42:26 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson