I heard a young person claim that Jon Huntsman was the best candidate for his peer group. As ridiculous a claim as the one that Ron Paul is our best shot at beating Obama. Silly.
Ron Paul is not a viable candidate. Period. His foreign policy is dangerous.
I'm (hopefully) done with this thread. Ron Paul is a non-subject, and any discussion of his having a snowball's chance in hell of winning, or coming close to winning the Republican nomination is ludicrous.
He's not even a Republican.
My anecdotal observations are supported by hard data (i.e donations by members of the military)
Yours are simply pulled out of your ass with no basis whatsoever.
>> “and any discussion of his having a snowball’s chance in hell of winning, or coming close to winning the Republican nomination is ludicrous.” <<
.
I agree, so why do we constantly have to be distracted by this foolishness on every thread now?