Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer

Re-engage the intellect, please. Palin’s description of Santorum seems, to most, to imply that he’s paleo-conservative, a political caveman, a far-right winger. Yet you see Santorum as a lying leftist expletive, a Steele-ish, moderate near-traitor. Can’t be both? Is Sarah wrong? Is Sarah such a lib-lover that the man you portray as a leftist still looks like a hyper-conservative caveman to her? Or did you get it wrong?

El confuso.


41 posted on 02/22/2011 10:30:25 AM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: flowerplough
Palin’s description of Santrum was in response to him insinuating that she didn't attend CPAC because she has “all those children” and could make more money elsewhere.

Nothing in her comments insinuated he was a far right winger, unless you associate conservatism with the “barefoot and pregnant” contingent.

Do you?

46 posted on 02/22/2011 11:07:44 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson