Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GLOBAL WARMING = U.N. SUCK-UP
Boot's Blast ^ | Wednesday, June 05, 2002 | John LeBoutillier

Posted on 06/06/2002 8:40:27 AM PDT by M 91 u2 K

The brouhaha this week over the Bush Administration’s report to the UN agreeing that there is indeed ‘global warming’ is yet another attempt to enlist international support to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

Two weeks ago when President Bush toured Europe trying to coax an anti-Iraq ‘coalition’ from the leaders of Russia, France, Italy and Germany, he was met with a chorus of dissent. Their objection? “Why do you Americans do everything on your own? You will not agree to the International Criminal Court, you are always late paying your UN dues and you won’t sign the Kyoto Treaty.”

Determined to have a ‘regime change’ in Baghdad, Team Bush returned home and began crafting a strategy to woo our erstwhile European allies. The plan was simple: say we agree that there is Global Warming without offering any solutions – and certainly not agreeing with the Kyoto Treaty.

The monkey wrench came when Matt Drudge and Rush Limbaugh revealed the administration’s shift and quickly rallied overwhelming conservative disappointment over yet another ‘Bush Betrayal’ of a conservative position.

Monday night, faced with a strong ‘revolt on the right,’ White House political guru Karl Rove sketched out the fall-back position: trot the President out to blame the ‘bureaucracy’ – always a convenient conservative target – and to claim that W is still against Kyoto.

How cynical of Rove and the Bush Team.

Exactly whose ‘bureaucracy’ is it, anyway? The EPA is in GOP hands and a Bush fave, Christie Whitman, is running it.

Do they really think we are going to believe that Whitman is going to send such an explosive report to the United Nations without White House approval?

Clearly Rove miscalculated the firestorm that Drudge and Rush ignited Sunday night and Monday. But W and Rove again seem to have temporarily snookered most conservatives by this very lame ‘bureaucracy’ ploy.

Underneath it all is the desire to get the world focused on removing Saddam. Since early spring, other events have pre-empted talk of a new war against Iraq. The never-ending Israeli-Palestinian debacle has clearly distracted both the White House and the Mid-East leaders we would need to conduct such an action.

The worrisome thing is the cavalier way this White House takes conservatives for granted. Just like the first President Bush, this crowd thinks it has the Right in its hip pocket and that there is no logical conservative to challenge them in the 2004 primaries. In other words, there is no Pat Buchanan or Ross Perot to cut into the Bush Base.

Well, guess what?

2004 is a long, long way away. Who knows what will happen by then? Who knows what new political stars may emerge – including conservatives – who might indeed do to this Bush what happened to the first President Bush in 1992?

The disingenuous ‘bureaucracy’ excuse won’t wash. It indicates a deep disdain for conservatives and a cynical ‘breaking’ of campaign pledges in the style of ‘read my lips.’

Prediction: the Bush White House will come to greatly regret this abandonment – however short it may have been – of its environmental pledges. The Right in this country can and will easily abandon the Bushes if something better comes along. 8:26 PM


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I really dont see were else besides the Republican party conservatives can turn too. Third Party candidates such as Buchanan or Perot get Democrats into the White House. Our only hope is a conservative republican willing to rough it out in the primaries against the Bush Dynasty in 2004.
1 posted on 06/06/2002 8:40:28 AM PDT by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
“Why do you Americans do everything on your own?"

Gee maybe its because the rest of the world can be counted on to disagree with us on just about every issue. Maybe its because we're a sovereign nation, not quite ready to accept the NWO.

2 posted on 06/06/2002 8:47:03 AM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat
"The Right in this country can and will easily abandon the Bushes if something better comes along."

I will joyfully abandon the Republican Party which, in its way, isn't so different from the Dims. I hope and pray for an alternative, but until then I'll have to vote Pub, warts and all. W should take note....Conservatives are getting angry with his Leftist agenda.

3 posted on 06/06/2002 8:51:58 AM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K

"I really dont see where else besides the Republican party conservatives can turn too..."

We can stay home.Frankly, I'm moving toward voting for the Beast, just to get the war going. This slow boat is not for me. I'll take the express.

4 posted on 06/06/2002 8:57:28 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
Why are we so hot to bomb Iraq when we should have bombed Riyadh? The Saudis are the source of global Islamic terrorism, but god forbid we offend our liddle oil buddies.
5 posted on 06/06/2002 9:00:39 AM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
I have always said we need four major parties, but the major parties won't let anyone else in. That's why third party candidates and libertarians don't even get in on Presidential debates.

The truth is, half of either party has to hold their nose when they vote for their own party. There isn't enough diversity.

6 posted on 06/06/2002 9:04:15 AM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggerjohn
Why are we so hot to bomb Iraq when we should have bombed Riyadh? The Saudis are the source of global Islamic terrorism, but god forbid we offend our liddle oil buddies.

First replace the Iraqi government. Secure Iraqi oil supplies for the West. Then, eliminate the Saudi government.

7 posted on 06/06/2002 10:10:24 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
bttt
8 posted on 06/08/2002 12:37:02 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson