Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's army to prepare for 'military struggle'
cnn.com | today | Willy Wo-Lap Lam

Posted on 03/13/2002 9:57:36 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant

China's army to prepare for 'military struggle' March 12, 2002 Posted: 10:57 PM EST (0357 GMT)

Willy Wo-Lap Lam Senior China Analyst

(CNN) -- Chinese President Jiang Zemin has asked the armed forces to make "solid preparation for military struggle" in order to attain national reunification.

While addressing military delegates to the National People's Congress, Jiang said: "to solve the issue of Taiwan and realize complete reunification of the motherland is one of the three major tasks for the Party and the nation in the new century."

However, Jiang, who is also Chairman of the policy-setting Central Military Commission (CMC), did not lay down specific tactics or a definite time-frame for taking back Taiwan.

Sources close to the People's Liberation Army (PLA) said Jiang was using harsher than usual rhetoric on Taiwan partly in response to recent events between Taiwan and the United States.

They included the on-going visit to the U.S. by Taiwan Defense Minister Tang Yao-ming and American arms sale to the island.

"Jiang is facing more pressure particularly from mid-ranking PLA officers to be tougher with Taiwan and the U.S.," said an army source.

"Jiang's response is that the nation must focus on economic development. He is, however, willing to satisfy the generals' demand for bigger budgets."

In his speech to the PLA delegates, Jiang stressed the importance of a hi-tech army -- and the need to take advantage of China's entry to the World Trade Organization to learn more about the armies of Western countries.

The president, however, underscored the imperative of the party's strict control of the PLA.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
lets get it on now if we are gonna get it on at all
1 posted on 03/13/2002 9:57:36 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
What do you mean?
2 posted on 03/13/2002 10:02:13 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
the need to take advantage of China's entry to the World Trade Organization

Same deal with China's rapidly-evolving space program. They would deny Western powers access to space while using space capabilities in a military operation against Taiwan. They will be on the moon by 2010, and they won't be just visiting like NASA/Apollo.

3 posted on 03/13/2002 10:03:42 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

4 posted on 03/13/2002 10:04:49 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
if we are going to fight china we should do it sooner rather than later thanks to x42 china will soon triple its amount of warheads also it gives them more time to solidify their hold on the panama canal
5 posted on 03/13/2002 10:05:19 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wallace212
Red Ping 2012
6 posted on 03/13/2002 10:05:54 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Where are the Chicoms on their Canal Zone deal? Do they get administration and defense?

If the latter, there's no reason they couldn't try to pull a Cuban Missile Crisis on us.

7 posted on 03/13/2002 10:11:28 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2; hopalong; sawdring
bttt
8 posted on 03/13/2002 10:12:17 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
thats right not to mention if they attack taiwan that they wont sink a few oil tankers in the canal forcing us to go around s. america or africa to get to their defense
9 posted on 03/13/2002 10:15:08 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2, Sir Gawain
Willy Wo-Lap Lam

I can't get past the name LMAO

10 posted on 03/13/2002 10:17:00 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Willy Wo-Lap Lam

Did he know Wong Wei?

11 posted on 03/13/2002 10:19:27 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
reunification of the motherland is one of the three major tasks for the Party and the nation in the new century

I wonder what the other two are. I'm guessing one of them is to manufacture every tennis shoe on the planet.

12 posted on 03/13/2002 10:23:20 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Most favored nation China. Watch unfold.
13 posted on 03/13/2002 10:28:57 AM PST by Broker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
I will begin to worry if there is a sudden pet chew toy famine in America because the PLAN is suddenly acquiring about a million or so rowboats.

Absent a LOT of amphibious sealift (more than the US Navy has at this time) able to support an opposed assault, any Chinese "military struggle" for Taiwan will need Louis Farrakhan as a consultant, because it will be the "Million Man Swim."

14 posted on 03/13/2002 10:33:49 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
O please, give it a rest. The Chinese are a problem, but they are not evil like the Moslems. DO NOT TAKE YOUR EYES of the ball. ISLAM is the problem. The chinese people did not take our planes into the twin towers. Please!
15 posted on 03/13/2002 10:39:55 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
oh because of some islamic wackos attacked us we should just forget about that communism thing and let it slide we will see how you feel when nuke are detected in costco shipping containers floating through the panama canal
16 posted on 03/13/2002 10:46:38 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
thats right not to mention if they attack taiwan that they wont sink a few oil tankers in the canal forcing us to go around s. america or africa to get to their defense

All of our Aircraft Carriers ALREADY go around S. America or Africa to get to Taiwan...because ALL of our aircraft carriers are too wide to fit through the canal.

The same is true of pretty much all of the supertankers bringing imported oil.

And, as it is, the Chinese Navy could easily be crushed by just a part of the US Fleet that is already based on the West Coast.

The Panama Canal isn't quite the strategic linchpin it used to be.

17 posted on 03/13/2002 11:09:41 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Looks like the army may soon have some target practice...
Chinese oil workers in massive protest
In his speech to the PLA delegates, Jiang stressed the importance of a hi-tech army -- and the need to take advantage of China's entry to the World Trade Organization to learn more about the armies of Western countries.
And US (and foreign) firms are helping:
Foreign firms 'must help boost China's defence'
18 posted on 03/13/2002 12:36:28 PM PST by batter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Entering a war against China would be like punching your fist into a fire ant nest.
Sure, you're bigger and stronger. But there's more of them. Many, many more.

I wouldn't be so confident of our ability to defeat them in warfare.
Smugness is a poor defense against a determined enemy.

19 posted on 03/13/2002 2:47:46 PM PST by Archaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Archaeus
Entering a war against China would be like punching your fist into a fire ant nest. Sure, you're bigger and stronger. But there's more of them. Many, many more.

That depends on the arena in question. On land, you have a point. In the air or on sea--where we would be most likely to fight them, because of Taiwan--they don't have the material needed.

I wouldn't be so confident of our ability to defeat them in warfare.

What KIND of warfare? I don't think we'd go for the straight-out infantry slugging match.

Smugness is a poor defense against a determined enemy.

Making an enemy ten feet tall when he isn't is a poor way to win a war.

20 posted on 03/13/2002 2:54:07 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson