[KC_Conspirator]

I guess is that the congressional leaker is from California.

That is a good guess since it appeared in the LA Times. However, I am not so sure that geography has much to with it. For example, Ron Brownstain of the LA Times has DNC connections around the country and routinely publishes proganda from DC and even acted like an agent for Algore.

My guess is that this is a person who was privy to the report and has connections to Mr. Arkin, the originator of the article for the LA Times and most likely has an anti-nuke history, if not anti-intelligence, anti-defense, and anti-American.

[hchutch]

Just great, that's 99% of the Dems in California's Congressial Delegation, and even then it might be some OTHER Dem who leaked it, which means we are still talking 85% of the Dems in Congress!

[SwatTeam]

"My guess is that this is a person who was privy to the report and has connections to Mr. Arkin, the originator of
the article for the LA Times and most likely has an anti-nuke history,
if not anti-intelligence, anti-defense, and anti-American."

Well, that pretty much means every democrat in Congress, doesn't it? And a few RINO's, I might add.

[KC Burke]

Bret Hume and his panel did an analysis of Arkin's involvement and cited him as an Anti-Nuc activist writer in the past who probably published this normal targeting scenerio exercise, mandated by law and commonly updated, as though it was something else to spin it to get the rest of the World worried.

Liberal media, falling under the spell of extreme leftist writers is nothing new.

I would love to see Arkin pulled before a Judge to name his source if this is indeed a National Security breech. Even it he doesn't name his source, its possible he could go to jail for contempt if it was a violation of law and he is covering the violator. Its a win-win deal as far as I can tell.