THis article claims that the CIA did send the info about the Saudis back to Washington. Was it being sent somewhere else or being sat upon/ Why isn't George Tenet in the hot seat for this? Or was Tenet ordered by Clinton and then Bush not to have the info sent to Washington?
The Saudis call Hamas freedom fighters and not terrorists. The Saudis heavily support Hamas terror operations in Israel AND in the US. Hams is currently working closely with AlQaeda and Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad and helped in the 9/11 attacks and in the OKC bombing.
The Saudis paid for the huge arms cache on board an Iranina frieghter intecepted by Israel on its way to Arafat and the PLO (Arafat AND the Saudis lied to Bush about this)
Prince Abdullah's peace plan is not to be trusted and is the same plan that Bush hattched and Colin Powell was to have proposed to the UN on 9/11 without having consulted the Israels! The plan also gives the PLO control over Christian Holy sites in Jersusalem.
Saudi billionaire Khalid Mahfouz bankrolled the Holy Land Foundation and InfoCom who supported Hamas, AlQaeda and Iraqi terrorists out of Dallas for over 9 years. Mahfouz was implicated in the attacks on the USS Cole. Mahfouz was involved in corrupt business deals with GW Bush and Jackson Stephens at Harken Energy.
Bush ordered the FBI to back off investigating Saudi Royal Family business operations in the US one month before the 9/11 attacks.
Also the Saudis persecute Christians in Saudi Arabia. The penalty for converting from Islam to Chrisianity to Islam in Saudi Arabia is death. There is a story about Saudi persecution of Christians on the WorldNet Daily Web site today.
Islam is not a religion of peace. It is a religon of conquest. The Saudis are the leading backers of Islam. They are extreme AntiChristians.
You intended to write "did Not", correct?
This article claims that the CIA did NOT send the info about the Saudis back to Washington.
Very troubling issues:
WHY has the CIA been covering for the Saudis? WHO has really been pulling the strings?
WHY have Clinton (understandably so), and now Bush been laying off the Saudis in light of overwhelming evidence of an overtly HUGE hand in sponsoring terrorism? Such evidence suggests the Saudis are THE ring-leaders of world-terrorism.
WHY is the Bush State Department still playing nerf-ball with the Saudis?
Is that part of the world so genetically insane, unreasonable, and vile that the Saudis, according to the know-it-alls at the think-tank at the St. Dept., are considered the best and most dependable hope for Arab stability and "friendship"?
Dammit -- they have declared war -- what are we waiting for??
I'd like to see more follow ups on this, this and the insider stock trading. They've only had 6 months now to cover their tracks, and that story is deader'n a dodo in the shamestream press. That's a lot of time to shred documents, wipe hard drives, and reinsert "innocent' stuff, and possibly create believable legends for some patsies to take the fall if it ever is forced out. The stock trading should have been by far one of the bigger stories pursued, and that it hasn't been, almost universally, just goes to show how much total raw control these "they" guys have over all the media.