Huh?? That rings of clintoon's statement There's not one SHRED of evidence, which is probably a true statement if the shreds were burned! If he dumped the body and did a good job, then there's not one sign of the body! Horsehockey. You are comparing apples to oranges here. We all know evidence was destroyed during the Clinton Administration. We know they openly defied Congress and refused to hand over documents that were requested. We also know Clinton himself committed perjury.
What do we have here? Apparent holes in an alibi. What else do we have? Someone or something placing Condit there at the time of Levy's diappearance? Nope. Condit telling another that he took Chandra Levy? Uh-uh.
Is there anything that really, actually suggests other than innuendo and speculation that Gary Condit had anything at all to do with Levy's being missing, anything from a FACTUAL standpoint?
Nooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Move on, nothing to see here?. . ./sarcasm
Well, we'll see what comes out of Condidit's visit to the Grand Jury. . .he's pretty slick alright. I don't know what he's done if anything. But I don't trust the guy. I detest his arrogance and total disregard for Chandra, whom he had a "relationship" with (he used her) and all he cares about is HIS political career. He couldn't give a RAT'S A** less about her. Did you see his interview with Connie Chung? That was all about Gary. That was his re-election campaign kickoff for all intents and purposes, IMHO. . .
Yeah, Gary's the victim. I get it!