That's only if it is indeed "evidence". Off handed comments taken out of context is not.
The NOTHING here is the NOTHING Condit is saying about the big holes in his timeline alibi on the day Chandra was last seen, the NOTHING he is saying about his whereabouts on the Thurs he missed the votes in the House, the NOTHING he is saying about him trying to reach Chandra when her parents called him to report her disappearance, the NOTHING he is saying about the phone call from the McDonalds to Ann Marie, the NOTHING he is saying to Chandra's parents, the NOTHING he is saying to the Police, etc.etc.etc.
So he missed some votes. Other Congressmen do it as well. In fact, I wonder if there may have been anyone else who missed some votes that same day. Maybe they helped Condit? (If you cannot see how silly this sounds, I feel quite sorry for you.)
And has anyone, anyone at all, been able to place Condit at or near Levy's home at the time of her disappearance? Um, uh, NO!
By your admission he doesn't even have half a brain so how can he be fit to serve in Congress much less on the Intelligence Committee?
And who said he is? Not me.
What do you have against FOX? All the other networks and cable channels were running the same stories, except ABC. Or is it the WE REPORT YOU DECIDE that you don't like?
I do not have anything against Fox. But when you devote most of your news time to speculation, including some hilarious innuendo ("Condit threw a garbage bag into a dumpster miles away from his home! Why? What was in it? (Psst! Do you think it may be because he is getting tired of having people constantly go through his garbage at home? We report. You decide.) ")
And by the way, there is a word for the act of printing or broadcasting something about a person or company that you know to be untrue, with the malicious intent: Libel.
It's called freedom of the press and free speech.
See above.
The votes Condidit missed were on a Thurs. immediately after Chandra's disapperance. These are the only votes Condidit had missed in years. That Thurs would have been a great time to "get rid of the body" or to do whatever else he had to do to clean up. No one else has suggested a connection with other Congressmen because they missed a vote, except you. You are the one that is using non-sequetor arguments and are not arguing from the facts. You are the one who looks silly here.
And has anyone, anyone at all, been able to place Condit at or near Levy's home at the time of her disappearance? Um, uh, NO!
Again, lets argue from the facts. The holes in Condidit's alibi timeline gives him ample opportunity to be at Chandra's apt or meet her somewhere. If he would fill in those blanks in the timeline it would go a long way to taking the heat off of himself.
I do not have anything against Fox. But when you devote most of your news time to speculation, including some hilarious innuendo ("Condit threw a garbage bag into a dumpster miles away from his home! Why? What was in it? (Psst! Do you think it may be because he is getting tired of having people constantly go through his garbage at home? We report. You decide.) ")
Again you are not arguing from the facts. The watchbox was not at his home, but in his office. All trash thrown out from the Congressmen's offices is disposed of in a secure way so there was no need for him to single this watchbox out and drive miles away to dispose of it. The watch from this watchbox was an expensive gift from a previous girlfriend who he was having an affair with. Now, if he had given this watch to Chandra and the watch was found on her if they found the body then it strengthens his connection with her.
See how silly it sounds when you're not arguing from the facts.
Chandra and her parents are who I feel sorry for.