Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Certifies Theft Of Russian Nuclear Material Has Occurred
AFP (Space Daily) ^ | Feb 23, 2002 | Maxim Kniazkov

Posted on 02/25/2002 5:02:46 AM PST by The_Victor

by Maxim Kniazkov
Washington (AFP) Feb 23, 2002
An undetermined amount of weapons-grade nuclear material has been stolen in post-Communist Russia, heightening concerns that some of it could have ended up in the wrong hands, the US intelligence community has concluded.

The announcement comes amid warnings by top US officials that Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda terrorist network have been making a concerted effort to obtain the know-how and materials to manufacture a crude nuclear or radiological device.

"We also believe that bin Laden was seeking to acquire or develop a nuclear device," Central Intelligence Agency Director George Tenet told Congress earlier this month. "Al-Qaeda may be pursuing a radioactive dispersal device -- what some call a 'dirty bomb.'"

In his testimony, the CIA director refrained from disclosing where al-Qaeda operatives could be shopping for such technology.

But the National Intelligence Council, in its annual report to Congress, made public late Friday, gave a strong warning that despite foreign assistance and its own efforts to heighten security, Russia still represents a serious nuclear proliferation risk.

"Weapons-grade and weapons-usable nuclear materials have been stolen from some Russian institutes," said the council, the collective analytical think tank for the 13 agencies that make up the US intelligence community.

"We assess that undetected smuggling has occurred, although we do not know the extent or magnitude of such thefts," the report said. "Nevertheless, we are concerned about the total amount of material that could have been diverted over the last 10 years."

A total of 23 attempts to steal fissile materials, which can be found in Russia in more than 300 buildings at over 40 locations across the country, were uncovered and thwarted by Russian authorities between 1991 and 1999, according to the document.

The problem remains how many smugglers made off with particles of plutonium or enriched uranium -- a hot commodity on the black market -- without being detected.

"Russian facilities housing nuclear materials typically receive low funding, lack trained security personnel, and do not have sufficient equipment for securely storing nuclear materials," the council said.

The documented cases of nuclear theft in Russia include the disappearance of 1.5 kilograms (3.3 pounds) of 90-percent-enriched weapons-grade uranium from the Luch Production Association in 1992.

In 1994, according to the council, three kilograms (6.6 pounds) of weapons-grade uranium were stolen in Moscow.

Four years later, there was a hair-raising incident at an unnamed nuclear facility in the Chelyabinsk region, in the Ural Mountains, where according to Viktor Yerastov, a top official at the Russian Atomic Energy Ministry, the amount stolen was "quite sufficient ... to produce an atomic bomb."

While admitting that US intelligence could not independently confirm the theft, the National Intelligence Council said the Chelyabinsk case was "of concern."

Four grams (0.14 ounces) of weapons-usable enriched uranium that "likely originated in Russia" was seized in Bulgaria.

Even sites storing nuclear weapons, which are surrounded by layers of security, cannot be seen as problem-free because of drug and discipline problems among the servicemen, and their low pay, the report said.

In May 2000, two students at a training center that prepares guards for nuclear weapons facilities were expelled because they had failed their drug tests.

That same month, the Russian Defense Ministry started using officers instead of enlisted men for guard duty while transporting nuclear warheads because of seven incidents in just one month when sentries had left their posts.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Didn't see this at all here. A little old for "breaking news", but still very significant.
1 posted on 02/25/2002 5:02:46 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Russia used the threat of 'disappearing' nuclear material as a way to extort money from us to help them 'protect' the supply. Slick willie was happy to participate in the money laundering scheme!
2 posted on 02/25/2002 5:07:31 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
As if we needed any more reason, motivation, or moral high-ground to go after al-Qaeda.

Let's roll.

3 posted on 02/25/2002 5:07:59 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: *TerrOrWar
Indexing
5 posted on 02/25/2002 5:13:38 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
. Slick willie was happy to participate in the money laundering scheme!

A Democrat to the core, this traitor was always eager to find a way to flit away our hard-earned tax money.

6 posted on 02/25/2002 5:15:27 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nobodyUknow
You hit the nail right on the head. For all the "Russia is our friend now" crowd, consider this... what if they allowed it to be stolen? Very convenient to have a few Islamic radicals to take the fall, popping off a nuke on US soil and being completely detached from the op itself. Cause Russia has never used a surrogate state/ group/ individual to do their dirty work for them. They don't mind the US being the "only" superpower left, no not at all...
7 posted on 02/25/2002 5:18:35 AM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Since Yeltsin saw to it that millions upon millions of dollars in foreign aid 'disappeared' I have no doubt that it was shared with slick willie and that was the plan from the start.
8 posted on 02/25/2002 5:37:29 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"Weapons-grade and weapons-usable nuclear materials have been stolen from some Russian institutes,"

Someone know the difference(s) between -grade and -usable? A quick google search didn't turn up what they are.
9 posted on 02/25/2002 5:43:56 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Al-Qaida isn't the only one who probably wanted to get their hands on this stuff. Any of the Axis of Evil would also be prime suspects.
10 posted on 02/25/2002 5:44:34 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Of course, there's plenty of such material stolen from the US DOD - it only makes page 9 of the NYT.

Hello.

11 posted on 02/25/2002 6:04:14 AM PST by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
We're going to lose a city. It's only a matter of time. The keys will be how we handle the social chaos and threat of economic collapse that will follow.
12 posted on 02/25/2002 6:10:42 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
We're going to lose a city. It's only a matter of time.

This has always bothered me. What will we do? What if we lose several cities? Do respond with nukes? Where do we nuke? Scary.

13 posted on 02/25/2002 6:16:43 AM PST by Northpaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Northpaw
Well, there won't be any good response. We can't really nuke Baghdad or any Middle Eastern city in response - it would not deter future attacks from Al Qaeda types who don't care about the people in Riyadh, anyway. We can round up a lot of Muslim students and hope we get the right ones. We can ban Middle Eastern travelers from entering the US. We can attack countries who harbor terrorists, maybe with tactical nuclear weapons. None of these things will make much difference after the fact.

The biggest problem would be the economic collapse. No one who works in a US city would ever feel safe going back to work. The stock market would crash hard - 1929-style. Europe would line up against us, rationalizing that we deserved it and hoping that by speaking against us they wouldn't be the next target.

In short, any nuclear attack on any US city could destroy the United States as a functional state within a few years. Thanks to the NEA, we aren't the fierce, resilient, determined people we were in the 50's - look how we've pretty much forgotten 9/11 already. Al Qaeda knows this, and I'm sure the US Government does, too. Interesting things must be happening behind the scenes.

14 posted on 02/25/2002 6:40:35 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
xSoviet weapons-grade fissionables had a high level of impurities compared to those of other countries, which meant they decayed to useless crap in 8-12 years and had to be constantly recooked. Which Russia hasn't had been able to do much of in the past ten years for budget reasons.

This story would have been alarming 6-7 years ago. Today it means we should ask, "Was it recooked after 1991?" If it wasn't, any attempt to use it will result in a poisonously messy fizzle at best.

15 posted on 02/25/2002 7:12:23 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
I think that a warning needs to be given. Any future attack of mass destruction on the United States by an Islamic group will be met with absolute destruction of any and all Islamic countries. On the surface, this sounds crazy, but is it? Millions of innocents would die, you say. Well, had the Soviet Union launched a nuclear attack on us, our retaliation would have been visited upon all Russians, including millions of innocent women and children. We had no problem making that threat public, so why do we hesitate now? I tell you what, there would be some countries cleaning up their act real quick.
16 posted on 02/25/2002 7:14:25 AM PST by Northpaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Northpaw
Well, I can guarantee it won't be Washington D.C.

Washinton D.C. is the seat of corruption in America, and without all of the support that communists get from our socialist pinko democrat representatives, their power would be gone. This is starting to get scary as hell, and frankly if we are nuked, we need to respond with extreme predjudice. If it's a bunch of Muslims, we nuke Mecca. Just the threat alone should keep them from starting anything with us. I think we need to let them know in a not so subtle way that any nuclear action against us will end in the terrorist country's extinction.

17 posted on 02/25/2002 7:18:56 AM PST by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
what if they allowed it to be stolen?

An interesting premise - However, the Russians have as much (or more) to fear from Islamic radicals as we do. I do not believe that they Russian government would willingly relinquish positive control of weapons material for that reason, not because I believe that they can be trusted to be responsive to U.S. security concerns.

18 posted on 02/25/2002 7:21:49 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: boston_liberty
Thanks. Here's what the Agency's report says about weapons-grade vs. weapons-usable (reformatted).

Weapons-usable material is defined as

uranium enriched to 20 percent or greater in the uranium-235 or uranium-233 isotopes (highly enriched uranium—HEU) and any plutonium containing less than 80 percent of the isotope plutonium-238.

Weapons-grade material is typically defined as

uranium enriched to greater than 90 percent uranium-235 or uranium-233, or plutonium-239 containing less than 6 percent plutonium-240.
20 posted on 02/25/2002 8:41:15 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson