Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's laser of death cleared for take-off
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 02/17/2002 | Sean Rayment

Posted on 02/16/2002 4:17:58 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last
To: samtheman; xp38
Thank you very much!
101 posted on 02/16/2002 9:07:16 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

"Laser of Death"

With really cool names like this we won't have to fight any wars...

Now we need the "Gun of Wiping Out Entire Armies in One Shot," and a few other well named goodies, and we're ready to go.

102 posted on 02/16/2002 9:07:17 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Clowns are BAD news. Their shoes contain much more explosive material than the typical Reebok or Nike and the rubber chickens can take out entire planes if tossed into the turbines.

What do you suggest, airport screeners looking for garish facepaint, smuggled horns, or dare I say it, outright clown-profiling?

103 posted on 02/16/2002 9:12:45 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: piasa
What do you suggest, airport screeners looking for garish facepaint, smuggled horns, or dare I say it, outright clown-profiling?

Clowns aren't born, they're made... just like fairies.




104 posted on 02/16/2002 9:14:52 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
...has led the Pentagon to identify the need for a more sophisticated and deadly weapons system.

You need a man for the job!


105 posted on 02/16/2002 9:15:19 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Any word on whether the sequel will be "The Sombreronator?"



106 posted on 02/16/2002 9:17:19 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Foghat
Hey, It's Sunday............. Thought you would find this interesting.
107 posted on 02/16/2002 9:20:09 PM PST by suni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: suni
Actually it's still Saturday in the civilized side of the country!! LOL

This laser is killer stuff, we've used lasers for targeting for a long time, and to think during the Reagan years they made fun of him and his "Star Wars" craziness as they called it. Reagan got them again!! "Well, There you go again!!"

I love it when a plan comes together!!
108 posted on 02/16/2002 9:23:33 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

To: Jewels1091
IT SEEMS CLEAR from various reports from personal friends and others that at least part of what's available is at least ostensibly from back engineering or outright technology transfers from ET's . . .

Anti-grav vehicles. Supposedly some stealth craft have dual types of propulsion/flight systems.

[to those prone to rabid remarks re such--No, thanks, I already have a container full of tinfoil hats. Start your own collection.]

110 posted on 02/16/2002 9:32:42 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"This was around 1973. He talked about US use of lasers in Vietnam and I just took him for goofy. But over the years, I have seen enough references to wonder if maybe we were indeed playing around with lasers back then. "

We were, in the late 60's. And by the late 70's to early 80's there was the top of a mountain missing in New Mexico.

111 posted on 02/16/2002 9:32:49 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
You could be right, but I think it would take a long time for anyone else to build something like that. Wonder what the temp is from one of those lasers...would it melt glass?
112 posted on 02/16/2002 9:35:47 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Quix
BTW, SUCH ET assistance-in-design CRAFT were fairly old hat per my relative's perspective 30 years ago. One can fantasize about the progress since. He asserted that Mainland China had been mapped inch by inch by remote controlled such craft. . . and that some such craft carried only bombs and could easily do radical flight stuff. . . some carried people and had greater limitations therefore. Supposedly such could reach any spot on the globe virtually instantaneously.

Stranger things have happened. . . we shall see.

113 posted on 02/16/2002 9:36:24 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I think it more plausible to believe in scientists and engineers thinking this stuff up than believing some ETs, whose existance has yet to be proven, thought this stuff up.

The technology isn't THAT far out. It's cool stuff, but not beyond comprehension ...and it's all based on foundations of prior discoveries. It's not like this stuff just popped out of the blue for no reason. Discovery was accelerated not by some extraterrestrial beings but by a concept rather new to humankind which blossomed only recently- free speech and the free expression of ideas, freedom of religion, and the protections on private intellectual property- all of which gave an incentive for inventors and companies to share their discoveries by openly publishing them and discussing them, and by selling rights to them. That was a big thing since prior to these concepts coming into practice, guilds worked hard to keep their trade secrets exclusive; scientists and other thinkers could be persecuted as heretics, and designs could be stolen, rather than purchased, and those who had not invented them were able to profit on the scientific work of others by ruining the market for the original discoverer, taking his customers. Reforms in Europe and the birth of America as a country finally got things rolling. The old restrictions fell away and were replaced with a desire for progress- we prospered from it. The US drew the greatest minds and entrepreneurs from all over the world, which in turn feuled even more discoveries. It was only natural that such progress occur exponentially.

114 posted on 02/16/2002 10:08:53 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

Comment #115 Removed by Moderator

To: piasa; Jhoffa_; Sabertooth; jwh_Denver
Many laser mirrors are front coated mirrors that do not cause distortion of the beam by the glass or quartz material that the coating is applied to.
116 posted on 02/16/2002 10:21:22 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
And the Telegraph is privy to this information how?

The Discovery Channel aired a program a few months ago showing guys shooting prototype lasers and talking about military uses.

117 posted on 02/16/2002 10:33:40 PM PST by Victoria_R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This is AWESOME!!!
I love new weapons...
THEL...gotta love it!

Or, at least respect it.

118 posted on 02/16/2002 10:40:37 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Many laser mirrors are front coated mirrors that do not cause distortion of the beam by the glass or quartz material that the coating is applied to.

Very interesting, but a little flat for a "Laser of Death" thread.





NOW we're cooking.



119 posted on 02/16/2002 10:41:16 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I knew we could count on you. I figured they would be some other sort of mirror, because glass causes so many problems, but do these mirrors work on any kind of laser and does the reflected light 'suffer' any loss from being bounced off of mirrors?

Would a laser simply burn off dust on the mirror's surface? And would a powerful laser be more likely to react to blemishes and imperfections in a mirror- if, for example, the mirror was scratched or pocked? Would it then reflect off of the 'good' parts of the mirror but burn into the flaws, possibly warping or destroying the mirror?

I would figure that in order to use a mirror as a 'defense' the mirror would have to completely cover the area you need to protect, otherwise you may be dead before the laser hits the place where you put your mirror... you don't know exactly where the thing is going to be aimed. To use the mirror to actually turn a laser against its operator, you'd have to to hit the plane carrying the laser, not neccessary the exact point where the laser is emitting, nor neccessarily at the same 'power', but at least with enough intesity to blind the aircraft and its crew. But you would also have to have the mirror (or mirrors) aimed at the plane before it fires, because there won't be time when it fires. And you'd have to have your own weaponry in case the plane turns out to be conventional and drawn to your highly polished reflective shell.

It might be easier just to build your own laser and hope you get to fire first.

120 posted on 02/16/2002 11:13:32 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson