Posted on 02/13/2002 4:45:34 AM PST by New Horizon
PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - President Bush has decided to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, and has ordered the CIA, the Pentagon and other U.S. agencies to devise plans to remove him, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported Wednesday.
The newspaper said no military strike was imminent. But it quoted unnamed U.S. officials as saying Bush had decided that Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs pose too great a threat to U.S. national security for Saddam to remain.
``This is not an argument about whether to get rid of Saddam Hussein. That debate is over. This is how you do it,'' the Inquirer quoted a senior Bush administration official as saying.
The newspaper said the White House was determined to act even if U.S. allies do not help, and is now waiting for government agencies to come up with a combination of military, diplomatic and covert plans aimed at achieving Saddam's ouster.
Escalating U.S. rhetoric on Iraq has alarmed Russia and America's European allies in recent weeks, while causing concern among experts about the political and human costs of a lengthy U.S. military campaign in the Middle East.
But the Inquirer said the CIA recently presented Bush with a plan to destabilize Saddam's well-entrenched regime in Baghdad, through a massive covert action campaign, sabotage, information warfare and significantly more aggressive bombing of the so-called no-fly zones over northern and southern Iraq.
The president was reportedly enthusiastic, and although it could not be determined whether he gave final approval for the plan, the CIA has begun assigning officers to the task, the newspaper reported.
Vice President Dick Cheney is also expected to tell Middle East leaders about U.S. intentions to get rid of Saddam during a tour of 11 Middle Eastern nations next month, the Inquirer said.
``He's not going to beg for support,'' a senior official was quoted as saying. ``He's going to inform them that the president's decision has been made and will be carried out, and if they want some input into how and when it's carried out, now's the time for them to speak up.''
Maybe I'm missing something.
Dear Saddam:
Buh bye!!!
Love George.
Hopefully Rummy will come out and say this is a false rumor. Sometime the press are idiots!
You have to love this team.
But we have, we certainly have, and it was intentional. It is part of the campaign. Relax, the adults are in charge.
Thank god for that!!! :-)
Congress voted on it when it gave President Bush carte blanche to go after terrorist nations who pose a direct threat to the US.
Why take out Saddam first? Because until Saddam is no longer a threat, we are stuck in that rathole Saudi Arabia, propping up a degenerate monarchy that would as soon spit at us as look at us. With Iraq no longer under Saddam's thumb, Iraq is no longer a direct threat to Saudi Arabia, and we don't have to babysit them anymore. If we ditch Saudi Arabia first, without neutralizing Saddam, then Iraq simply comes in and helps itself, because the Saudis wouldn't last 3 weeks w/o US military aid.
They voted on this in 1991. The Gulf War was won with terms of surrender. Those terms were broken by Iraq in 1998. When you breach a contract, the other part may act accordingly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.