Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government wants to replace security company at airports
http://www.nandotimes.com ^ | February 11, 2002 | Associated Press By JONATHAN D. SALANT

Posted on 02/11/2002 4:24:27 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK

Nation: Government wants to replace security company at airports

WASHINGTON (February 11, 2002 7:22 p.m. EST) - The government wants to put troubled Argenbright Security Inc. out of the security business at the nation's airports.

The Federal Aviation Administration is seeking bids from other security companies to take over Argenbright's airline security operations. Argenbright has 40 percent of the market.

The FAA now oversees airline security, but that responsibility shifts to the new Transportation Security Administration beginning Sunday. The new agency also will supervise security screeners, a job now done by the airline industry.

By Nov. 19, some 30,000 federal employees, hired and trained by the TSA, will screen all passengers and luggage. Until then, private companies will continue to handle security screening as the new federal work force is phased in.

An Argenbright spokeswoman, Cynthia Faulkner, said the company was "ready to work with DOT and TSA and the aviation authorities during the transition period."

Last week, Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta said the government would not sign any new contracts with Argenbright but the company would continue its current operations. Now, the Transportation Department doesn't want Argenbright to handle any airport security.

Argenbright staffed security checkpoints at Newark and Washington Dulles airports, where two of the planes hijacked on Sept. 11 took off from. The company also handled some security at Boston's Logan Airport but not the areas where the two other hijacked planes took off from. The company lost its Boston contract after post-Sept. 11 security lapses.

There have been other problems as well. In November, Argenbright screeners allowed a man to pass through a Chicago checkpoint with knives and a stun gun. Last month, a company screener allowed a man whose shoes set off an explosive detection device to disappear from the San Francisco airport.

Argenbright, accused of hiring criminals to staff security checkpoints, was fined more than $1 million in May 2000 for failing to conduct background checks. Federal prosecutors charged in October 2001 that the company was still hiring convicted criminals.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/11/2002 4:24:28 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Wasn't this pointed out by FReepers when the law was passed in Congress? Argenbright had made some really big mistakes that week in their security, especially in Boston, and they still kept their contract. Glad to hear that something is being done about it.
2 posted on 02/11/2002 4:28:07 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Yep Freepers were on this from DAY 1
3 posted on 02/11/2002 4:29:20 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Great. Now we have government paid morons who can't be fired at the checkpoints.
4 posted on 02/11/2002 4:40:12 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The FAA now oversees airline security, but that responsibility shifts to the new Transportation Security Administration beginning Sunday. The new agency also will supervise security screeners, a job now done by the airline industry.

Oh, goody. Yet another Administration. We're saved.

5 posted on 02/11/2002 5:55:44 PM PST by Hank Rearden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I'm not a big fan of having the Gov take over day-to-day operations, but Argenbright has been awful all along, and something should certainly be done about this company.

Argenbright, I read somewhere along the line, is a British company owned by Israelis. Does anybody know if this is true?

6 posted on 02/11/2002 6:28:02 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Is that Argenbright or Aren'tTooBright
7 posted on 02/11/2002 6:35:00 PM PST by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Blood of Tyrants
Now we have government paid morons who can't be fired at the checkpoints.

I heard that the compromise legislation that was signed specified that they can be fired. Anybody know anything more specific?

9 posted on 02/11/2002 7:12:50 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Federal prosecutors charged in October 2001 that the company was still hiring convicted criminals.

Were ANY of the 911 hijackers "convicted criminals?

Frankly I'd rather have a seach crew made up of red-blooded American felons than nice clean cut Arab Muslims with no discernible criminal record.

Blood is thicker than water, and most American-born felons are more loyal to this country than just about any of the recent immigrants we have to this country. Most of our immigrants fly the flag of their foreign country and boo the US team at soccer competitions. And these are the guys that have been searching me at the airports.

10 posted on 02/11/2002 7:26:07 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Do you really think that declaring the same morons and illegals to be feds will make a difference? The feds pointed out how many illegals there were employed at AP's as one of their reasons for taking over however, I can't remember the dissembling jerks ever saying that their solution was to grant the same illegals citizenship?? Has one congressvermin taken any responsibility for the Linda Dasholes of the world going around the FAA to congress to get exemptions for their clients?
11 posted on 02/11/2002 8:06:51 PM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Headline:Government wants to replace security company at airports

It occurs to me, upon further reflection, that this 
statement is merely a tiny subset of the fact that
our legislators would like to replace, or control,
everything.

12 posted on 02/12/2002 4:28:41 AM PST by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
our legislators would like to replace, or control, everything.

That occurred to me, too, when the idea was first proposed. And I don't even own a tinfoil hat.

13 posted on 02/12/2002 9:33:12 AM PST by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
Ahh, but do you own tin foil hat pre-cursors or tin foil hat making parts, supplies, equipment, and/or paraphenalia?

(Sorry, I couldn't resist. ;-)

14 posted on 02/12/2002 11:10:08 AM PST by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Can anyone recall the thread that reported that since so many existing security people were not citizens, that requirement would be changed?
The illegal alien rights organizations had gone ballistic.
15 posted on 02/20/2002 11:43:47 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson