Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran: 'unimaginable' retaliation if Israel hits nuclear plant
Ha'aretz ^ | 2/4/02 | By Daniel Sobelman

Posted on 02/04/2002 1:12:15 PM PST by truthandlife

Iran warned Israel on Monday not to consider attacking its nuclear power plant, saying the Islamic republic would retaliate in ways "unimaginable" to the Jewish state.

"If Israel carries out any military action against Iran, it will face a response that will be unimaginable to any Israeli politician," Defense Minister Admiral Ali Shamkhani told Arabic-language al-Jazeera television. He said he was not referring to a nuclear response.

The admiral was responding to a question about what Iran's reaction would be to a possible Israeli attack on an Iranian nuclear power plant under construction by Russian experts near the Gulf port of Bushehr.

Iranian media often warn of a possible Israeli strike against the Bushehr plant similar to Israel's air attack on an Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981.

"Iran is not a small country like Iraq. Iran has a powerful artillery, a disciplined army and skilled air defences," Jazeera quoted Shamkhani as saying.

According to Shamkhani, Israel cannot carry out an attack against the nuclear power plant in Bushehr, and Iran does not fear such a thing. Shamkhani noted that he does not even consider the possibility of Israel bombing the nuclear plant.

Shamkhani is thought to be close to Iran's spiritual leader Ali Hamani, who appoints all of the important ministers in the Iranian government.

The warning came amid growing U.S. pressure on Iran to halt its alleged efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction.

U.S. President George W. Bush has in the past week issued a series of warnings to Iran, along with Iraq and North Korea, accusing them of being an "axis of evil."

Iran strongly denies seeking nuclear weapons and says its atomic program is for non-military use.

Both Israel and the United States have tried but failed to convince Russia to stop its military and nuclear energy cooperation with the Islamic republic.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2002 1:12:15 PM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
This a breeder reactor? Anyone have details?
2 posted on 02/04/2002 1:18:07 PM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
already posted
3 posted on 02/04/2002 1:20:09 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/facility/bushehr-reactor.htm

The focus of a considerable amount of controversy in the United States, the nuclear facility at Brushehr, Iran is being built under an agreement between the Russian and Iranian governments for $800-million. Although originally intended to be the location of a German-built reactor in the 1970s, the new reactor will be built to Russian designs, though the original reactor buildings exterior appearance will remain essentially the same. There are two reactors at Bushehr, one is in an advanced stage of completion the other has not been worked on for some time and is not currently scheduled to be completed.

Recently acquired high resolution satellite imagery, from the Space Imaging IKONOS satellite, discloses that the external structure of the first reactor unit is substantially complete. In comparison with lower resolution imagery from the late 1990s, it is quite evident that substantial progress has been made in recent years in preparing this unit for the installation of the reactor and associated equipement. There is little evidence of progress towards completion of the second reactor unit.

Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, though it has not ratified two additional protocols to the International Atomic Energy Agency's Program 93 + 2, which is designed to prevent states from developing nuclear weapons covertly despite IAEA inspections as Iraq was able to do prior to the Gulf War. Iran maintains that it will not ratify 93 + 2 due to it being denied civilian nuclear technology for Bushehr, despite its positive record with the IAEA.

Nuclear power industry contacts between Iran and Russia are based on the intergovernmental agreements of 25 August 1992, on cooperation in the civil use of nuclear energy and in the construction of a nuclear power plant in Iran.

On 23 February 1998, the US State Department reaffirmed US opposition to Iran's nuclear program. The United States has argued that Iran has sufficient oil and gas reserves for power generation, and that nuclear reactors are expensive, unnecessary, and could be used for military purposes. The United States strongly opposes the project, which was permitted under the NPT, and has in the past provided Russia with intelligence information pointing to the existence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program. Despite this, the Russians appeared to be proceeding with work on Bushehr.

US pressure to prevent the construction of Brushehr has not been limited to Russia. On March 6, 1998, during a visit by US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Ukraine announced that it would not sell turbines for use with reactors at Bushehr. The contract had been worth $45 million. Five days later, Vice President Gore met with Russian Prime Minister Chernomyrdin and discussed, among other things, US concerns over Russian exports of nuclear and missile technology to Iran.

Iran claims that its nuclear power is for peaceful purposes and that it will help free up oil and gas resources for export, thus generating additional hard-currency revenues.

During a March 2001 Moscow summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian President Mohammed Khatami, Khatami confirmed plans to order a second reactor after the first is delivered, possibly by late 2002. Delays in delivering the first plant — first ordered in the mid-1990s — have been a source of friction between Iran and Russia. The Iranian leader signaled his intention to proceed with a second contract that could be worth up to $1 billion.

Iran has also been considering the construction of three to five additional reactor facilities, which may or may not be located at Bushehr, for an estimated cost of $3.2 billion. A Sept. 5, 2001 Moscow Times report indicates that the Russians will be submitting plans for the construction of additional reactors at Bushehr and that negotiations could begin as soon as December 2001, though the number of reactors being proposed is unclear nor is it apparrent how much the project might cost. It is estimated that the total cost of building the reactor complex at Bushehr may be roughly $4-6 billion since construction began in 1976.

A major question involved with the Brushehr site concerns the degree to which the site is complete and the estimated time until the facility becomes fully operational. The original contract signed by the Russians and the Iranians sets delivery to be no later than March 19, 2004 (or the end of the Iranian year 1382). But whether this target will be met remains uncertain.

In April 2001 an Iranian News Agency report states that the main nuclear reactor had already been completed and was being transported from Russia to Bushehr. The reports also stated that as of April 2001, the first phase of the construction project was 51 percent complete, though it is unclear how many phases are involved in the projects construction.

A June 27, 2001 Interfax report claimed that the Bushehr facility is over 80 percent complete, despite numerous work slowdowns associated with the pouring of additional concrete so that the German building might properly house the Russian system, and it appears that the original blueprints for the facility had to be remade. Additionally, Russian and Iranian officils were as recently as August 2001 quoted as saying that the facility will be completed by the end of 2001. But Leningrad Metallurgy Plant stated in early August 2001 that the assembly of the main components of the 1,000 MW turbine will be complete in December 2001. It is unclear what the status of the rest of the system is, as officials in Tehran were quoted in the May 10, 2001 MEED Quarterly Report - Iran as saying that Bushehr may not come on line for three years.

On 04 September 2001 the Interfax News Agency bulletin quoted Deputy Russian Atomic Energy Minister Yevgeny Reshetnikov as saying that Unit I will not be complete until early 2004, that the actual reactor will be sent to Bushehr in November 2001, and that the Russians have begun to install the main equipment, noting that the project was 55 to 60 percent complete.

Reactor Construction Site - March 2001


4 posted on 02/04/2002 1:33:07 PM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mvonfr
Sorry. I put the search in but nothing came up.
5 posted on 02/04/2002 1:35:19 PM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Iran has a powerful artillery, a disciplined army and skilled air defences,

I guess that explains how they lost 700,000 men to Saddam's 70,000 in 1980-1988 ... some say it was closer to 1,000,000 ...

I guarantee you if they point nuclear missiles at Israel the IDF will be coming ... the F-15's can reach Iran, but they might use their new submarines ...
6 posted on 02/04/2002 1:41:13 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Best to wait until the key to the front door is turned over to the buyer. The morning before the ribbon-cutting ceremony. Reduces collateral damage.
7 posted on 02/04/2002 1:49:00 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Still waiting for "the mother of all battles," maybe a saber rattling contest.
8 posted on 02/04/2002 1:50:06 PM PST by ChuteTheMall GawdSortaMount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Lots of things get posted 2 and 3 times...if they weren't, most of us would miss them all together....
9 posted on 02/04/2002 1:52:47 PM PST by Uglywhiteguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Find the Iranian nuclear power plant in this photo.


10 posted on 02/04/2002 1:54:53 PM PST by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
Asteroid hits Iranian Nuke Plant....oooops.
11 posted on 02/04/2002 1:56:20 PM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Retaliation from Iran will produce laughter throughout the whole planet.
12 posted on 02/04/2002 2:01:54 PM PST by BARGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
It seems that the bigger the threats are, the more ineffective their military is. They'll probably employ their masterful tactic of "human wave assaults" so Israeli nuetron weapons can destroy them in one shot.

The only thing they'll win is the propaganda battle in the mid-east.

13 posted on 02/04/2002 2:10:24 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Do the words "all blow" mean anything?
14 posted on 02/04/2002 2:10:40 PM PST by calmseas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: truthandlife
This does not look like a site presently under construction: no vehicles, no cranes, no stockpiles of materials. A photo covering a larger area would be helpful.
16 posted on 02/04/2002 2:12:16 PM PST by jonathonandjennifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jonathonandjennifer
There are two reactor buildings at Bushehr, on the left is Unit I, which is in an advanced stage of completion, Unit II on the right has not been worked on for some time and is not currently scheduled to be completed.
17 posted on 02/04/2002 2:23:19 PM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
the new reactor will be built to Russian designs

If I were the Iranians, I'd be worried about more than an Israeli attack....think Chernobyl..

18 posted on 02/04/2002 2:39:07 PM PST by ipatent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
More bluster from the barbarians - reminiscent of the boastful claims of Saddam Hussein before the Gulf War. Are these "leaders" so foolish as to imagine they would not on Caribbean vacation at Camp Guantanamo within weeks of our decision to act?
19 posted on 02/04/2002 2:50:47 PM PST by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson